Classification of rotator cuff tendinopathy using high definition ultrasound.

BACKGROUND ultrasound is a valid cost effective tool in screening for rotator cuff pathology with high levels of accuracy in detecting full-thickness tears. To date there is no rotator cuff tendinopathy classification using ultrasound. The aims of this study are to define a valid high-definition ultrasound rotator cuff tendinopathy classification, which has discriminate validity between groups based upon anatomical principles. METHODS 464 women, aged 65-87, from an established general population cohort underwent bilateral shoulder ultrasound and musculoskeletal assessment. Sonographer accuracy was established in a separate study by comparing ultrasound findings to the gold standard intra-operative findings. RESULTS there were 510 normal tendons, 217 abnormal tendons, 77 partial tears, and 124 full-thickness tears. There was no statistical difference in age or the proportion with pain between the abnormal enthesis and partial tear groups, however both groups were statistically older (p<0.001) and had a greater proportion with pain (p<0.001 & p=0.050) than normal tendons. The full-thickness tears were statistically older than normal tendons (p<0.001), but not abnormal/partially torn tendons. The proportion with pain was significantly greater than both groups (p<0.001 & p=0.006). Symptomatic shoulders had a larger median tear size than asymptomatic shoulders (p=0.006). Using tear size as a predictor of pain likelihood, optimum sensitivity and specificity occurred when dividing tears into groups up to 2.5cm and >2.5cm, which corresponds with anatomical descriptions of the width of the supraspinatus tendon. CONCLUSION the classification system is as follows: Normal Tendons; Abnormal enthesis/Partial-thickness tear; Single tendon full-thickness tears (0-2.5cm); Multi-tendon full-thickness tears (>2.5cm).

[1]  Johnny Padulo,et al.  Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal - Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field Science Research: 2016 Update. , 2016, Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal.

[2]  A. Carr,et al.  An independent learning method for orthopaedic surgeons performing shoulder ultrasound to identify full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  C. Hing,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Clinical radiology.

[4]  Y. Endo Accuracy of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Patients With Suspected Subacromial Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[5]  I. Sekiya,et al.  Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. Surgical technique. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  I. Sekiya,et al.  Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  L. Funk,et al.  Are shoulder surgeons any good at diagnosing rotator cuff tears using ultrasound?: A comparative analysis of surgeon vs radiologist , 2008, International journal of shoulder surgery.

[8]  B. Morrey Accuracy of Office-Based Ultrasonography of the Shoulder for the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tears , 2006 .

[9]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Detection and measurement of rotator cuff tears with sonography: analysis of diagnostic errors. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  H. Smith,et al.  Diagnostic ultrasound of the shoulder—a method for experts only? , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[11]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Fow,et al.  The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  E. April,et al.  Anterior and posterior musculotendinous anatomy of the supraspinatus. , 2000, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Ultrasonography of the Rotator Cuff: A Comparison of Ultrasonographic and Arthroscopic Findings in One Hundred Consecutive Cases* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  D Lee,et al.  Musculoskeletal ultrasound. , 2000, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[16]  E. Itoi,et al.  Humeral attachment of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons: an anatomic study. , 1998, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.