Assessing the Accuracy of National Land Cover Dataset Area Estimates at Multiple Spatial Extents

Site-specific accuracy assessments evaluate fine-scale accuracy of land-use/land-cover (LULC) datasets but provide little insight into accuracy of area estimates of LULC classes derived from sampling units of varying size. Additionally, accuracy of landscape structure metrics calculated from area estimates cannot be determined solely from site-specific assessments. We used LULC data from Rhode Island and Massachusetts as reference to determine the accuracy of area measurements from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) within spatial units ranging from 0.1 to 200 km 2 . When regressed on reference area, NLCD area of developed land, agriculture, forest, and water had positive linear relationships with high r2, suggesting acceptable accuracy. However, many of these classes also displayed mean differences (NLCD - REFERENCE), and linear relationships between the NLCD and reference were not one-to-one (i.e., low r 2 , β 0 ¬= 0, β 1 ¬= 1), suggesting mapped area is different from true area. Rangeland, wetland, and barren were consistently, poorly classified.

[1]  Christopher P. Dunn,et al.  Methods for analyzing temporal changes in landscape pattern , 1991 .

[2]  S. J. Brady,et al.  Regional habitat appraisals of wildlife communities: a landscape-level evaluation of a resource planning model using avian distribution data , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles , 1998 .

[4]  James D. Wickham,et al.  An ecological assessment of the United States mid-Atlantic region , 1997 .

[5]  Jim Hinsdale.  Salt and Pepper , 2014 .

[6]  Terry L. Sohl,et al.  Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data , 1998 .

[7]  John F. Paul,et al.  Relationships between watershed Stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Carolyn T. Hunsaker,et al.  Hierarchical Approaches to the Study of Water Quality in RiversSpatial scale and terrestrial processes are important in developing models to translate research results to management practices , 1995 .

[9]  J. F. Paul,et al.  Landscape metrics and estuarine sediment contamination in the mid-Atlantic and southern New England regions. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[10]  Limin Yang,et al.  Thematic accuracy of MRLC land cover for the eastern United States , 2001 .

[11]  Michael N. DeMers,et al.  Fundamentals of Geographic Information Systems , 1996 .

[12]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[13]  J. Beauchamp,et al.  A Geographic Information System approach to modeling nutrient and sediment transport , 1993 .

[14]  J. Vogelmann,et al.  Regional Land Cover Characterization Using Landsat Thematic Mapper Data and Ancillary Data Sources , 1998 .

[15]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[16]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Relationships Between Landscape Structure and Breeding Birds in the Oregon Coast Range , 1995 .

[17]  Ross S. Lunetta,et al.  North American Landscape Characterization dataset development and data fusion issues , 1998 .

[18]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[19]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[20]  R. Congalton.  Exploring and Evaluating the Consequences of Vector-to-Raster and Raster-to-Vector Conversion , 1997 .