Determinants of Computer Self-Efficacy—An Examination of Learning Motivations and Learning Environments

The purpose of this article is to discuss determinants of computer self-efficacy from the perspective of participant internal learning motivations and external learning environments. The former consisted of three motivations—interest, trend, and employment—while the latter comprised two environments—home and school. Through an intermediate variable—computer use—a causal model was constructed to analyze how the determinants affected participant computer self-efficacy. To validate the model, 235 vocational and technology college and university students were surveyed. The results indicated that computer use and interest motivation had significant direct effects on participant computer self-efficacy, as did school environment and trend motivations, but the latter was negative. The home environment and employment motivations had indirect effects on computer self-efficacy through computer use, as did the interest and trend motivations. Among the correlations of determinants, the home environment was significantly correlated with all of the learning motivations, but school environment was not. Demographic analysis indicated that most of the students were not satisfied with the learning environment of schools. The results could provide useful and practical information for educational administrators, computer instructors, and students.

[1]  Yau-Jane Chen,et al.  A Path Analysis Of The Concepts In Moore’s Theory Of Transactional Distance In A Videoconferencing Learning Environment , 2007 .

[2]  Robert R. Hirschfeld,et al.  Achievement and avoidance motivational orientations in the domain of mentoring , 2006 .

[3]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Christine L. Jackson,et al.  Challenge and hindrance stress: relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts , 2004 .

[6]  Thomas P. Van Dyke,et al.  Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Preben H. Lindøe,et al.  Job characteristics and computer anxiety in the production industry , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Lily Shashaani,et al.  Gender and computers: similarities and differences in Iranian college students' attitudes toward computers , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Huey-Wen Chou,et al.  Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[10]  H.-W. Chou,et al.  Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  The structure of computer anxiety: a six-factor model , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  B. Young.  Gender Differences in Student Attitudes toward Computers , 2000 .

[13]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[14]  P. MacIntyre,et al.  Motivational Influences on Computer-Related Affective States. , 1999 .

[15]  H. Becker.  Internet Use by Teachers: Conditions of Professional Use and Teacher-Directed Student Use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report #1. , 1999 .

[16]  Ibrahim M. Al-Jabri,et al.  The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: New evidence from a developing nation , 1998 .

[17]  T. Levine,et al.  Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge : A causal analysis , 1998 .

[18]  G. Bradley,et al.  Computer Experience, School Support, and Computer Anxiety , 1997 .

[19]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[20]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[21]  T. Busch.  Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[22]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Computer anxiety: A cross-cultural comparison of university students in ten countries , 1995 .

[23]  Bruce Rocheleau.  Computer use by School-Age Children: Trends, Patterns, and Predictors , 1995 .

[24]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[25]  J. Woodrow.  The Development of Computer-Related Attitudes of Secondary Students , 1994 .

[26]  Lily Shashaani.  Gender-Differences in Computer Experience and its Influence on Computer Attitudes , 1994 .

[27]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training , 1994 .

[28]  Matthew M. Maurer,et al.  Computer anxiety correlates and what they tell us: A literature review , 1994 .

[29]  Ann Thompson,et al.  Analysis of the Effect of Networking on Computer-Assisted Collaborative Writing in a Fifth Grade Classroom , 1995 .

[30]  D. G. Gardner,et al.  Computer use, self-confidence, and attitudes: A causal analysis , 1993 .

[31]  R. Kay.  An exploration of theoretical and practical foundations for assessing attitudes toward computers: The Computer Attitude Measure (CAM) , 1993 .

[32]  Vasilios Makrakis,et al.  Gender and computing in schools in Japan: the “we can, I can't” paradox , 1993 .

[33]  Jayne E. Geissler,et al.  University Students' Computer Knowledge and Commitment to Learning. , 1993 .

[34]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[35]  Lois Mayer Nichols.  The Influence of Student Computer-Ownership and in-Home Use on Achievement in an Elementary School Computer Programming Curriculum , 1992 .

[36]  M. Pajares,et al.  Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct , 1992 .

[37]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An examination of end-user types , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[38]  K. Krendl,et al.  Teachers' Attitudes toward Computers: A Review of the Literature , 1992 .

[39]  D. Schunk.  Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[40]  P. Bentler.  Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models , 1990 .

[41]  J. H. Steiger.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[42]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Measuring Computer Anxiety: The Computer Anxiety Scale , 1989 .

[44]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[45]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[46]  Desmond L. Cook,et al.  Computer Anxiety: Definition, Measurement, and Correlates , 1985 .

[47]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Maryland vs Michigan vs Minnesota: Another look at the relationship of expectancy and goal difficulty to task performance , 1980 .