Predicting the active period of popularity evolution: A case study on Twitter hashtags

Abstract The active period of popularity evolution indicates how long online content receives continuous attention from people. Although predicting popularity evolution has largely been explored, researches on predicting active period still remain open. If we know the duration of active period ahead of time, caching systems, online advertising, etc. can run more effectively. Therefore, predicting active period is of great importance, but it is a non-trivial task because of the two major challenges. First, numerous factors can influence the duration of active period. To predict active period accurately, it's difficult to consider what factors and how to embed them in DNN model. Second, the triggering time to predict different active periods must be decided carefully, because the durations of active periods differed from one another. This paper addresses these two challenges, focusing on Twitter hashtags as a case study. To deal with the first challenge, a DNN-based prediction framework is proposed, embedding dynamic and static factors by using LSTM and CNN respectively. To deal with the second challenge, an appropriate value of cumulative popularity is set to trigger predicting active period. Experimental and comparative results show the superiority of our prediction solution, comparing with spikeM and SVR.

[1]  Flavio Figueiredo,et al.  On the Dynamics of Social Media Popularity: A YouTube Case Study , 2014, TOIT.

[2]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Patterns of temporal variation in online media , 2011, WSDM '11.

[3]  Cheng Li,et al.  DeepCas: An End-to-end Predictor of Information Cascades , 2016, WWW.

[4]  Changjun Hu,et al.  Predicting Key Events in the Popularity Evolution of Online Information , 2017, PloS one.

[5]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information network , 2014, WWW.

[6]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Pulse of News in Social Media: Forecasting Popularity , 2012, ICWSM.

[7]  Fang Wu,et al.  Popularity, novelty and attention , 2008, EC '08.

[8]  Yongjun Li,et al.  A deep dive into user display names across social networks , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Changping Wang,et al.  RSDNE: Exploring Relaxed Similarity and Dissimilarity from Completely-Imbalanced Labels for Network Embedding , 2018, AAAI.

[10]  Flavio Figueiredo,et al.  TrendLearner: Early prediction of popularity trends of user generated content , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Vinícius M. A. de Souza,et al.  Evaluation of statistical and machine learning models for time series prediction: Identifying the state-of-the-art and the best conditions for the use of each model , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Niklas Carlsson,et al.  The untold story of the clones: content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity , 2012, KDD.

[14]  Scott Sanner,et al.  The Lifecyle of a Youtube Video: Phases, Content and Popularity , 2015, ICWSM.

[15]  Jussara M. Almeida,et al.  Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube videos , 2013, WSDM.

[16]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Information diffusion and external influence in networks , 2012, KDD.

[17]  Feng Liu,et al.  Understanding and predicting the peak popularity of bursting hashtags , 2017, J. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Rise and fall patterns of information diffusion: model and implications , 2012, KDD.

[19]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[21]  Anirban Mahanti,et al.  Spatio-temporal and events based analysis of topic popularity in twitter , 2013, CIKM.

[22]  Yao Ge,et al.  Top-k frequent items and item frequency tracking over sliding windows of any size , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[23]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Information diffusion through blogspace , 2004, WWW '04.

[24]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Do Cascades Recur? , 2016, WWW.

[25]  Scott Sanner,et al.  Expecting to be HIP: Hawkes Intensity Processes for Social Media Popularity , 2016, WWW.

[26]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Analysis of social voting patterns on digg , 2008, WOSN '08.

[27]  Xuanjing Huang,et al.  Retweet Prediction with Attention-based Deep Neural Network , 2016, CIKM.

[28]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the popularity of online content , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[29]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularity , 2015, KDD.

[30]  Steven Skiena,et al.  DeepWalk: online learning of social representations , 2014, KDD.

[31]  Meng Zhang,et al.  Multi-feature Fusion for Predicting Social Media Popularity , 2017, ACM Multimedia.

[32]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Predicting the popularity of web 2.0 items based on user comments , 2014, SIGIR.

[33]  Roger Zimmermann,et al.  A Multimodal Approach to Predict Social Media Popularity , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR).

[34]  Tomasz Trzcinski,et al.  Pay Attention to Virality: Understanding Popularity of Social Media Videos with the Attention Mechanism , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW).

[35]  Pablo Rodriguez,et al.  I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system , 2007, IMC '07.

[36]  Gao Cong,et al.  On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in Twitter , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Chun Wang,et al.  Social Media Prediction Based on Residual Learning and Random Forest , 2017, ACM Multimedia.

[38]  Seongsoon Kim,et al.  DeepPIM: A deep neural point-of-interest imputation model , 2018, Inf. Sci..