Geant4 Simulation of Number of Event Effect on the TLD LiF: Mg, Cu, P Energy Response

The effect of different number of events on the energy response of a bare thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) LiF: Mg, Cu, P chip has been simulated using Geant4. This simulation aims to determine the optimum number of events with minimum computational time. Fourteen photon energies in a range of 16–1250 keV with a range of 2×10 – 2×10 events were applied. A LiF: Mg, Cu, P chip with 4.5 mm diameter and 0.9 mm thick on the surface of 30×30 cm water phantom and a thin 10 μm slice of water (at 10 mm deep in the phantom) were considered as the sensitive volumes to calculate the respective absorbed dose DTLD and DW. The relative energy response R was calculated from DTLD and DW‘s ratio for each energy normalized to DTLD and DW ratio of energy 662 keV. 2×10 number of events were found to be the optimum number of events with minimum computational time. The simulation results were validated to the measurement results and the mean deviation of 0,59% was yielded. As the deviation is within the acceptable limit of ±25%, it was concluded that the results were considered satisfactory and the materials and physics processes applied in the code were correct.

[1]  Mayeen Uddin Khandaker,et al.  Composition and thickness dependence of TLD relative dose sensitivity: A Monte Carlo study , 2019, Radiation Measurements.

[2]  M. Caldeira,et al.  TYPE TESTING OF LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETERS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF Hp(10) AND Hp(0.07). , 2018, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  W. Priharti,et al.  Response of LiF: Mg,Cu,P TL detector simulated with Geant4 , 2017 .

[4]  S. Samat,et al.  Evaluation of deep and shallow doses for OSLD and TLD-100H , 2016 .

[5]  T. R. Montalvo,et al.  Thermoluminescent characteristics of LiF:Mg, Cu, P and CaSO4:Dy for low dose measurement. , 2016, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[6]  Y. Tayalati,et al.  GEANT4 Simulation of 192Ir Source to Study Voxelization and Number of Event Effect on the Dose Distribution , 2016 .

[7]  Z. Liu,et al.  Studies on energy response of newly developed LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL chips with additional PbO doping. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  D. Caruge,et al.  Recent Developments in Geant4 , 2014, ICS 2014.

[9]  W. Priharti,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Hp(10)meas/Hp(10)del Ratio for TLD–100H at Energy 24–1250 keV , 2013 .

[10]  P. Olko,et al.  Evaluation of the relative thermoluminescence efficiency of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL detectors to low-energy heavy ions , 2013 .

[11]  Hasnel Sofyan Dosimeter ThermoLuminesensi sebagai Dosimetri Personal dalam Pemantauan Dosis Radiasi Eksternal , 2012 .

[12]  P. Olko,et al.  Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  D. Bartlett,et al.  The MCNP-4C2 design of a two element photon/electron dosemeter that uses magnesium/copper/phosphorus doped lithium fluoride. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  P. Allisy-Roberts,et al.  Farr's Physics for Medical Imaging , 2007 .

[15]  H. Stadtmann,et al.  Simulated and measured Hp(10) response of the personal dosemeter Seibersdorf. , 2006, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  Elfida Elfida DOSIMETER FILM DAN TLD SEBAGAI DOSIMETER PERORANGAN , 2005 .

[17]  J. Seuntjens,et al.  Review of Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students , 2003 .

[18]  F. H. Attix Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry , 1991 .

[19]  A. Benedetto INTRODUCTION TO RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND RADIATION DOSIMETRY. , 1986 .

[20]  K. Goodall Radiation hazards and protection , 1959 .

[21]  J. Lucas Radiation Safety and Health Physics , 1959, Nature.