How Programme Teams Progress Agricultural Innovation in the Australian Dairy Industry

Abstract Purpose: This article outlines the emergence of programme teams in the Australian dairy farm sector as a response to counter weaknesses in the institutional environment for agricultural innovation which favours technology adoption/diffusion approaches. Design/methodology/approach: The strengths, weaknesses and risks of different approaches to innovation in the Australian dairy sector RD&E system are analysed and key features of an emerging programme team approach defined. The programme team approach is compared and contrasted with the features of innovation capacity from international literature. An analysis of the relative investment in this innovation capacity in different topics or domains of dairy innovation is provided. Findings: The programme team approach to innovation involves groups of researchers, extension people, public and private organisations, farmers, community groups, and policy and service groups brought together to progress innovation and change in a topic area or domain. Leadership of the process is provided by an area expert or champion. The team takes responsibility for: (a) understanding the businesses of key players who have an influence in the innovation or domain; (b) deciding the nature of the desired change that all stakeholders can align to; (c) identifying features of the enabling environment to establish what capacity is needed; (d) designing a ‘route to change’ strategy (in contrast to traditional route-to-market thinking); and (e) piloting and refining the approach within the target populations. The group manages emerging risks and keeps on top of issues, as well as identifies any knowledge gaps for research that are preventing innovation and change. Conclusions/practical implications: The programme team approach provides a semi-formal governance mechanism for innovation to develop, despite an institutional environment that favours technology adoption. Further, the activities of programme teams consist of practices which integrate research-led and demand-pull approaches. Currently, investment in such innovation capacity is relatively low and highly variable across different topic domains. Added value: The article provides tangible activities that managers of agricultural RD&E programmes can invest in to progress systemic approaches to innovation and is a guide for agricultural education and extension practitioners to proceed in their innovation work.

[1]  L. Klerkx.  Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector , 2009 .

[2]  Stephen Biggs,et al.  A multiple source of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion. , 1990 .

[3]  A. Maude,et al.  Leadership of place in the rural periphery: lessons from Australia's agricultural margins , 2010 .

[4]  Bernard M. Bass,et al.  Comment: Transformational Leadership , 1995 .

[5]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Leadership for sustainable innovation , 2007 .

[6]  R. Nettle,et al.  Water Security and Farming Systems: Implications for Advisory Practice and Policy-Making , 2009 .

[7]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: Farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands , 2008 .

[8]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Communication for Rural Innovation , 2004 .

[9]  M. Dodgson,et al.  Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia , 2011 .

[10]  Laxmi Prasad Pant,et al.  Learning and Innovation Competence in Agricultural and Rural Development , 2012 .

[11]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: an innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it , 2005 .

[12]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment , 2010 .

[13]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  The Many Turnings of Agricultural Extension in Australia , 2012 .

[14]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Puzzles in Organizational Learning: An Exercise in Disciplined Imagination , 2002 .

[15]  M. Goodwin.  The governance of rural areas: Some emerging research issues and agendas , 1998 .

[16]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Innovation systems and capacity development: an agenda for North-South research collaboration? , 2002 .

[17]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Enhancing agricultural innovation : how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems , 2006 .

[18]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Strengthening Agricultural Innovation Capacity: Are Innovation Brokers the Answer? , 2009 .

[19]  A. Devaux,et al.  Developing capacity for agricultural market chain innovation: Experience with the 'PMCA' in Uganda , 2010 .

[20]  Mark Paine,et al.  Collaboration in action: the Dairy Moving Forward response to drought , 2008 .

[21]  P. Morgan.  THE IDEA AND PRACTICE OF SYSTEMS THINKING AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT , 2005 .

[22]  Geoff A. Wilson,et al.  The Australian Landcare movement: towards ‘post-productivist’ rural governance? , 2004 .

[23]  G. Brunori,et al.  Towards a Better Conceptual Framework for Innovation Processes in Agriculture and Rural Development: From Linear Models to Systemic Approaches , 2009 .

[24]  Laxmi Prasad Pant,et al.  Innovations systems in renewable natural resource management and sustainable agriculture : a literature review , 2009 .

[25]  Paul E. Shaltry.  Book Review: Program Management for Improved Business Results , 2007 .

[26]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries , 2008 .

[27]  M. Taccetta-Chapnick.  Transformational leadership. , 1996, Nursing administration quarterly.

[28]  C. Leeuwis.  Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension , 2004 .

[29]  Terry Cutler,et al.  Venturous Australia: building strength in innovation , 2008 .

[30]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy , 2011 .

[31]  A. Hall,et al.  Beyond the supply chains of technology and commodity , 2012 .

[32]  R. Nettle,et al.  Farms and Learning Partnerships in Farming Systems Projects: A Response to the Challenges of Complexity in Agricultural Innovation , 2007 .

[33]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[34]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[35]  Tony Sorensen,et al.  Australian agricultural R&D and innovation systems , 2011 .

[36]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[37]  B. Godin.  The Linear Model of Innovation , 2006 .

[38]  Paine,et al.  Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia , 2012 .

[39]  Mark Paine,et al.  Aligning farm decision making and genetic information systems to improve animal production: methodology and findings from the Australian dairy industry , 2010 .

[40]  Boelie Elzen,et al.  Stimulating transitions towards sustainable farming systems , 2012 .

[41]  Niels Röling,et al.  Pathways for impact: scientists' different perspectives on agricultural innovation , 2009 .

[42]  Laxmi Prasad Pant,et al.  The promise of positive deviants: bridging divides between scientific research and local practices in smallholder agriculture , 2009 .

[43]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Operationalizing Demand-Driven Agricultural Research: Institutional Influences in a Public and Private System of Research Planning in The Netherlands , 2009 .

[44]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .