An Exploratory Study on the Two New Trends in Open Source Software: End-Users and Service

Many have been envisaging the emergence of Open Source Software (OSS) for general end-users and the enhancements in providing services and support, as the most critical factors for OSS success, and at the same time, the most critical issues which are holding back the OSS movement. While these two distinct waves in OSS evolution have become more observable, researchers have not yet explored the characteristics of these two distinct new waves. The current study found evidence for these two waves and further explored the two waves by empirically examining two hundred projects hosted in Sourceforge.net. We compared the characteristics of OSS projects that are intended for two disparate audiences: developers and end-users and found that projects for end-users supported more languages but also had more restrictive licenses as compared to projects for developers.

[1]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[2]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects , 2002, First Monday.

[3]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems , 2002, IEE Proc. Softw..

[4]  Nancy J. Frishberg,et al.  Getting to know you: open source development meets usability , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[6]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[7]  Yan Li,et al.  A Human Capital Perspective of Organizational Intention to Adopt Open Source Software , 2005, ICIS.

[8]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Defining Open Source Software Project Success , 2003, ICIS.

[9]  Jan Stage,et al.  Usability in open source software development: opinions and practice , 2006 .

[10]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  The business of open source , 2008, CACM.

[11]  Asif Khalak.  Economic model for impact of open source software , 2000 .

[12]  Stefano Comino,et al.  Government Policies Supporting Open Source Software for the Mass Market , 2005 .

[13]  Stefano Comino,et al.  From Planning to Mature: On the Determinants of Open Source Take-Off , 2007 .

[14]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  Homesteading the Noosphere , 1998, First Monday.

[15]  W. Hauck,et al.  Wald's Test as Applied to Hypotheses in Logit Analysis , 1977 .

[16]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[17]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[18]  Sherry Emery,et al.  Use of tobacco cessation treatments among young adult smokers: 2005 National Health Interview Survey. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[19]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2000, First Monday.

[20]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[21]  E. Hippel.  Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[22]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Usability and open-source software development , 2001, CHINZ '01.

[23]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[24]  David M. Nichols,et al.  The Usability of Open Source Software , 2003, First Monday.

[25]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm , 2000, ICIS.

[26]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[27]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  The GNU manifesto , 1990 .

[28]  Di Wu,et al.  Empirical study of the effects of open source adoption on software development economics , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[29]  Ravi Sen,et al.  A Strategic Analysis of Competition Between Open Source and Proprietary Software , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar , 1998, First Monday.

[31]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The Perils and Pitfalls of Mining SourceForge , 2004, MSR.

[33]  David G. Glance,et al.  Factors affecting the use of open source software in tertiary education institutions , 2004, First Monday.

[34]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: a content analysis of open source software case studies , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[35]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[36]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures , 2006, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[37]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[38]  Michelle Levesque,et al.  Fundamental issues with open source software development , 2004, First Monday.

[39]  Martin Michlmayr,et al.  Software Process Maturity and the Success of Free Software Projects , 2005, Software Engineering: Evolution and Emerging Technologies.

[40]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Open source software projects as virtual organisations: competency rallying for software development , 2002, IEE Proc. Softw..