Cramer-Rao lower bound for multitarget localization with noncoherent statistical MIMO radar

In this paper, we focus on the theoretical localization accuracy of two localization algorithms in noncoherent MIMO radar systems with widely separated antennas. The first one is the optimal method for multitarget localization which is simply to expand the dimension of the parameter vector and thus perform a global maximum of the joint likelihood function of all the targets. The second one is a suboptimal called successive-interference-cancellation (SIC) algorithm proposed in our previous work [1] which localizes targets one-by-one and clears the interference of previous declared targets. The Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for these two algorithms has been derived and compared with emphasis on special cases where some targets share no common range bins with any other targets. Numerical results demonstrate that the suboptimal SIC algorithm has little theoretical performance loss compared with the optimal method even when targets share some common range bins and the loss may be reduced by increasing the number of radar elements.

[1]  Fulvio Gini,et al.  Cramer-Rao Bounds and Selection of Bistatic Channels for Multistatic Radar Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[3]  Alexander M. Haimovich,et al.  Evaluation of Transmit Diversity in MIMO-Radar Direction Finding , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  L.J. Cimini,et al.  MIMO Radar with Widely Separated Antennas , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[5]  Jian Li,et al.  MIMO Radar with Colocated Antennas , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  J. Tabrikian,et al.  Target Detection and Localization Using MIMO Radars and Sonars , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Idnin Pasya,et al.  Joint direction-of-departure and direction-of-arrival estimation in an ultra-wideband MIMO radar system , 2014, 2014 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS).

[8]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  MIMO radar: an idea whose time has come , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Radar Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37509).

[9]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Widely Separated MIMO versus Multistatic Radars for Target Localization and Tracking , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Chen Baixiao,et al.  Angle estimation using ESPRIT in MIMO radar , 2008 .

[11]  Alexander M. Haimovich,et al.  Noncoherent MIMO Radar for Location and Velocity Estimation: More Antennas Means Better Performance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  R.S. Blum,et al.  Target localization accuracy and multiple target localization: Tradeoff in MIMO radars , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[13]  Alexander M. Haimovich,et al.  Target Localization Accuracy Gain in MIMO Radar-Based Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  A. Giordano,et al.  Detection and estimation theory and its applications , 2006 .

[15]  Alexander M. Haimovich,et al.  Cramer Rao bound on target localization estimation in MIMO radar systems , 2008, 2008 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[16]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Target Localization and Tracking in Noncoherent Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Radar Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[17]  Mark R. Morelande,et al.  Joint multi-target detection and localization with a noncoherent statistical MIMO radar , 2014, 17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION).