Long-Term Results following Fronto-Orbital Reconstruction in Nonsyndromic Unicoronal Synostosis

Background: Fronto-orbital reconstruction is the standard of care for repair of unilateral coronal synostosis. This study examined the relationship between age at initial surgery and need for secondary surgery, to determine the optimal age for reconstruction. Methods: The series comprised 81 patients with unicoronal synostosis who underwent reconstruction over a 30-year period by a single surgeon. Measured outcomes included reoperation rate, relapse/defect rate, relapse interval, and problem rate. Results: Average age at surgery was 11.3 months (range, 1.5 to 71 months). The problem rate was 27.2 percent. Mean follow-up was 69 months (range, 6 to 234 months). The postoperative defect rate was 73 percent. Sixteen patients (20 percent) underwent reoperation to correct secondary deformities. Whitaker category I or II results were achieved in 90.1 percent. Problem rates for patients aged 0 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, and older than 12 months were 13.3, 28, and 35, respectively. Secondary surgery was performed in 40 percent of patients whose first surgery was at 0 to 6 months, 7 percent aged 6 to 12 months, and 30.4 percent older than 12 months. After surgery, 87 percent of patients aged 0 to 6 months, 95 percent aged 6 to 12 months, and 87 percent older than 12 months had Whitaker category I or II results. Conclusions: Fronto-orbital advancement at younger than 6 months had the highest incidence of readvancement. Patients treated at 6 to 12 months had the least need for any secondary surgery; however, patients older than 12 months had the lowest incidence of readvancement. These results indicate that fronto-orbital advancement should be delayed until at least age 6 months to avoid relapse.

[1]  P. Stieg,et al.  Synostotic Frontal Plagiocephaly: Anthropometric Comparison of Three Techniques for Surgical Correction , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. Posnick Unilateral Coronal Synostosis (Anterior Plagiocephaly): Current Clinical Perspectives , 1996, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  J. Posnick,et al.  Apert syndrome: quantitative assessment by CT scan of presenting deformity and surgical results after first-stage reconstruction. , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Phillip K. T. Chen,et al.  Metopic Synostosis: Quantitative Assessment of Presenting Deformity and Surgical Results Based on CT Scans , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  J. Posnick,et al.  Crouzon syndrome: quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on CT scans. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  H. Machado,et al.  Long-term results after lateral canthal advancement for unilateral coronal synostosis. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  Jeffrey C. Posnick,et al.  Craniofacial Skeletal Measurements Based on Computed Tomography: Part II. Normal Values and Growth Trends , 1992 .

[8]  J. Posnick,et al.  Craniofacial Skeletal Measurements Based on Computed Tomography: Part I. Accuracy and Reproducibility , 1992 .

[9]  L. Whitaker,et al.  The Operative Treatment of Isolated Craniofacial Dysostosis (Plagiocephaly): A Comparison of the Unilateral and Bilateral Techniques , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  S. Bartlett,et al.  Craniosynostosis: an analysis of the timing, treatment, and complications in 164 consecutive patients. , 1987, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Early Surgery for Craniofacial Synostosis: An 8‐Year Experience , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  A. Sokol Early surgery for isolated craniofacial dysostosis , 1978 .

[13]  I. Munro,et al.  Surgical management of unilateral and bilateral coronal craniosynostosis: 21 years of experience. , 1978, Neurosurgery.

[14]  L. Whitaker,et al.  EARLY SURGERY FOR ISOLATED CRANIOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS: Improvement and Possible Prevention of Increasing Deformity , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Lateral canthal advancement of the supraorbital margin. A new corrective technique in the treatment of coronal synostosis. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  A. Hockley,et al.  Fronto-orbital re-operation in craniosynostosis. , 1994, British journal of plastic surgery.

[17]  D. Rénier,et al.  Timing of treatment for craniosynostosis and facio-craniosynostosis: a 20-year experience. , 1994, British journal of plastic surgery.

[18]  J. Posnick,et al.  Sagittal synostosis: quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on CT scans. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.