Same numbers, different meanings: How numeracy influences the importance of numbers for pro-social behavior

[1]  J. Baron,et al.  Confusion of Relative and Absolute Risk in Valuation , 1997 .

[2]  Tehila Kogut,et al.  Someone to blame: When identifying a victim decreases helping , 2011 .

[3]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Intuitive Numbers Guide Decisions , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[4]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  A Group Construal Account of Drop-in-The-Bucket Thinking in Policy Preference and Moral Judgment , 2011 .

[5]  Juan Leon,et al.  Explaining the Effect of Education on Health , 2010, Psychological science.

[6]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing , 1997 .

[7]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Valuations of human lives: normative expectations and psychological mechanisms of (ir)rationality , 2012, Synthese.

[8]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[9]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[10]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[11]  Ian Dawson,et al.  Psychophysical Numbing: When Lives Are Valued Less as the Lives at Risk Increase , 1999 .

[12]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[13]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations , 2005 .

[14]  V. Reyna,et al.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Proportion Dominance: The Generality and Variability of Favoring Relative Savings Over Absolute Savings , 2006 .

[16]  E. Peters.  Beyond Comprehension , 2012 .

[17]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual? , 2005 .

[18]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  General Evaluability Theory , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[19]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affective Motivations to Help Others: A Two-Stage Model of Donation Decisions , 2011 .

[20]  Carmen Keller,et al.  Using a Familiar Risk Comparison Within a Risk Ladder to Improve Risk Understanding by Low Numerates: A Study of Visual Attention , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Edward T. Cokely,et al.  Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[22]  P. Slovic,et al.  Numeracy as a precursor to pro-social behavior: The impact of numeracy and presentation format on the cognitive mechanisms underlying donation decisions , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[23]  V. Reyna,et al.  Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment. , 2012, Journal of behavioral decision making.

[24]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Attentional mechanisms in the generation of sympathy , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[25]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[26]  Hugo Young,et al.  One of Us , 1991 .

[27]  A. Culyer.  Identifiable Victim Effect , 2014 .

[28]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[29]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Effect of Risk Communication Formats on Risk Perception Depending on Numeracy , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[30]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Unstable Values in Lifesaving Decisions , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[31]  V. Reyna,et al.  Numeracy, Ratio Bias, and Denominator Neglect in Judgments of Risk and Probability. , 2008 .

[32]  E. Peters,et al.  Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[33]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[34]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[35]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  "One of us": Outstanding willingness to help save a single identified compatriot , 2007 .

[36]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Use of Narrative Evidence and Explicit Likelihood by Decisionmakers Varying in Numeracy , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers , 2007, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[38]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach: Rasch-Based Numeracy Scale , 2013 .

[40]  Brad E. Sheese,et al.  Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person x situation perspective. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Ben Greiner,et al.  An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments , 2004 .

[42]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice , 2008, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[43]  Ellen Peters,et al.  Numeracy and the Perception and Communication of Risk , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  J. Friedrich,et al.  How Many Casualties Are Too Many? Proportional Reasoning in the Valuation of Military and Civilian Lives1 , 2009 .

[45]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[46]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.