Global reaction to the recent outbreaks of Zika virus: Insights from a Big Data analysis

Objective The recent spreading of Zika virus represents an emerging global health threat. As such, it is attracting public interest worldwide, generating a great amount of related Internet searches and social media interactions. The aim of this research was to understand Zika-related digital behavior throughout the epidemic spreading and to assess its consistence with real-world epidemiological data, using a behavioral informatics and analytics approach. Methods In this study, the global web-interest and reaction to the recently occurred outbreaks of the Zika Virus were analyzed in terms of tweets and Google Trends (GT), Google News, YouTube, and Wikipedia search queries. These data streams were mined from 1st January 2004 to 31st October 2016, with a focus on the period November 2015—October 2016. This analysis was complemented with the use of epidemiological data. Spearman’s correlation was performed to correlate all Zika-related data. Moreover, a multivariate regression was performed using Zika-related search queries as a dependent variable, and epidemiological data, number of inhabitants in 2015 and Human Development Index as predictor variables. Results Overall 3,864,395 tweets, 284,903 accesses to Wikipedia pages dedicated to the Zika virus were analyzed during the study period. All web-data sources showed that the main spike of researches and interactions occurred in February 2016 with a second peak in August 2016. All novel data streams-related activities increased markedly during the epidemic period with respect to pre-epidemic period when no web activity was detected. Correlations between data from all these web platforms resulted very high and statistically significant. The countries in which web searches were particularly concentrated are mainly from Central and South Americas. The majority of queries concerned the symptoms of the Zika virus, its vector of transmission, and its possible effect to babies, including microcephaly. No statistically significant correlation was found between novel data streams and global real-world epidemiological data. At country level, a correlation between the digital interest towards the Zika virus and Zika incidence rate or microcephaly cases has been detected. Conclusions An increasing public interest and reaction to the current Zika virus outbreak was documented by all web-data sources and a similar pattern of web reactions has been detected. The public opinion seems to be particularly worried by the alert of teratogenicity of the Zika virus. Stakeholders and health authorities could usefully exploited these internet tools for collecting the concerns of public opinion and reply to them, disseminating key information.

[1]  Antonio Lima,et al.  Personalized routing for multitudes in smart cities , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[2]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  Zika Virus–Related News Coverage and Online Behavior, United States, Guatemala, and Brazil , 2016, Emerging infectious diseases.

[3]  G. Dick,et al.  Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. , 1952, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[4]  Jay M Bernhardt,et al.  Detecting themes of public concern: a text mining analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Ebola live Twitter chat. , 2015, American journal of infection control.

[5]  G. Román Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) , 2016 .

[6]  R T Wigand,et al.  Social media in Ebola outbreak , 2016, Epidemiology and Infection.

[7]  Mark Dredze,et al.  Could behavioral medicine lead the web data revolution? , 2014, JAMA.

[8]  Aparup Khatua,et al.  Immediate and long-term effects of 2016 Zika Outbreak: A Twitter-based study , 2016, 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom).

[9]  Daniela Amicizia,et al.  Assessing Ebola-related web search behaviour: insights and implications from an analytical study of Google Trends-based query volumes , 2015 .

[10]  Michael A Johansson,et al.  Zika and the Risk of Microcephaly. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  K. Ferdinand,et al.  Zika virus pandemic—analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform , 2017, American journal of infection control.

[12]  Zion Tsz Ho Tse,et al.  How people react to Zika virus outbreaks on Twitter? A computational content analysis. , 2016, American journal of infection control.

[13]  Mark Dredze,et al.  Leveraging Big Data to Improve Health Awareness Campaigns: A Novel Evaluation of the Great American Smokeout , 2016, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[14]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Update: Interim Guidelines for Health Care Providers Caring for Infants and Children with Possible Zika Virus Infection--United States, February 2016. , 2016, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[15]  Jay M Bernhardt,et al.  Local Health Departments Tweeting About Ebola: Characteristics and Messaging , 2017, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[16]  Laurent Hébert-Dufresne,et al.  Enhancing disease surveillance with novel data streams: challenges and opportunities , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[17]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Zika Virus and Birth Defects--Reviewing the Evidence for Causality. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  E. Segev,et al.  Temporal patterns of scientific information-seeking on Google and Wikipedia , 2017, Public understanding of science.

[20]  Carlos Castillo-Chavez,et al.  Mass Media and the Contagion of Fear: The Case of Ebola in America , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Mauricio Santillana,et al.  Utilizing Nontraditional Data Sources for Near Real-Time Estimation of Transmission Dynamics During the 2015-2016 Colombian Zika Virus Disease Outbreak , 2016, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[22]  L. Waddell,et al.  Scoping Review of the Zika Virus Literature , 2016, PloS one.

[23]  W. T. Hancock,et al.  Zika Virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013 , 2014, Emerging infectious diseases.

[24]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Digital disease detection--harnessing the Web for public health surveillance. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Carolyn Brown Zika virus outbreaks in Asia and South America , 2016, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[26]  Cécile Viboud,et al.  Reassessing Google Flu Trends Data for Detection of Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza: A Comparative Epidemiological Study at Three Geographic Scales , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Amadou Alpha Sall,et al.  Zika Virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013 , 2014, Emerging Infectious Diseases.

[28]  R. Lanciotti,et al.  Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Emmanuel Fournier,et al.  Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study , 2016, The Lancet.

[30]  Thomas J Papadimos,et al.  The Ebola Outbreak of 2014-2015: From Coordinated Multilateral Action to Effective Disease Containment, Vaccine Development, and Beyond , 2015, Journal of global infectious diseases.

[31]  V. Cao-Lormeau,et al.  Zika Virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013 , 2014, Emerging infectious diseases.

[32]  S. Nuti,et al.  The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  T. Lancet Zika virus: a new global threat for 2016 , 2016, The Lancet.

[34]  M. Santillana,et al.  What can digital disease detection learn from (an external revision to) Google Flu Trends? , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.