Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index

The effect of refractive‐index mismatch, as encountered in the observation of biological specimens, on the image acquisition process in confocal fluorescence microscopy is investigated theoretically. The analysis takes the vectorial properties of light into account and is valid for high numerical apertures. Quantitative predictions on the decrease of resolution, intensity drop and shift of focus are given for practical situations. When observing with a numerical aperture of 1·3 (oil immersion) and an excitation wavelength of 514 nm the centre of the focus shifts 1·7 μm per 10 μm of axial displacement in an aqueous medium, thus yielding an image that is scaled by a factor of 1·2 in the axial direction. Furthermore, it can be expected that for a fluorescent plane 20 μm deep inside an aqueous medium the peak intensity is 40% less than for a plane which is 10 μm deep. In addition, the axial resolution is decreased by a factor of 1·4. The theory was experimentally verified for test samples with different refractive indices.

[1]  C Cremer,et al.  Differences of size and shape of active and inactive X‐chromosome domains in human amniotic fluid cell nuclei , 1993, Microscopy research and technique.

[2]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Refractive index and axial distance measurements in 3-D microscopy , 1992 .

[3]  Kjell Carlsson,et al.  The influence of specimen refractive index, detector signal integration, and non‐uniform scan speed on the imaging properties in confocal microscopy , 1991 .

[4]  D. Rawlins,et al.  The point‐spread function of a confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution of 3‐D data , 1991 .

[5]  F. Groen,et al.  The one-point fluorescence response in confocal microscopy , 1991 .

[6]  C. J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Effects of aberrating layers and tube length on con focal imaging properties , 1991 .

[7]  T. Puck,et al.  The spatial distribution of exposed nuclear DNA in normal, cancer, and reverse-transformed cells. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  3‐D image formation in high‐aperture fluorescence confocal microscopy: a numerical analysis , 1990 .

[9]  R. W. Wijnaendts-van-Resandt,et al.  The Application Of Polarized Confocal Microscopy For The Size Measurement Of Resist Structures , 1989, Other Conferences.

[10]  Tony Wilson,et al.  The effect of aberrations on the axial response of confocal imaging systems , 1989 .

[11]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Aberrations in high aperture conventional and confocal imaging systems. , 1988, Applied optics.

[12]  Tony Wilson,et al.  Three‐dimensional imaging in confocal imaging systems with finite sized detectors , 1988 .

[13]  Ernst H. K. Stelzer,et al.  Applications Of Fluorescence Microscopy In Three Dimensions/Microtomoscopy , 1986, Other Conferences.

[14]  Hao Ling,et al.  Focusing of electromagnetic waves through a dielectric interface , 1984 .

[15]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Theory and practice of scanning optical microscopy , 1984 .

[16]  M. P. Givens.  Focal shifts in diffracted converging spherical waves , 1982 .

[17]  E. Wolf,et al.  Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems - I. An integral representation of the image field , 1959, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  H. H. Hopkins,et al.  The airy disc formula for systems of high relative aperture , 1943 .