Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues

[1]  S. Ellard,et al.  Rapid genomic testing for critically ill children: time to become standard of care? , 2021, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[2]  Z. Stark,et al.  Parents’ experiences of decision making for rapid genomic sequencing in intensive care , 2021, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[3]  G. Birchley.  The theorisation of ‘best interests’ in bioethical accounts of decision-making , 2021, BMC Medical Ethics.

[4]  D. Vears.  Should we respect parents’ views about which results to return from genomic sequencing? , 2021, Human Genetics.

[5]  B. McClaren,et al.  Rapid acute care genomics: Challenges and opportunities for genetic counselors , 2020, Journal of genetic counseling.

[6]  J. Savulescu,et al.  Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals’ Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing , 2020, AJOB empirical bioethics.

[7]  S. Sandaradura,et al.  Parental experiences of ultrarapid genomic testing for their critically unwell infants and children , 2020, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  Y. Lau,et al.  Rapid whole-exome sequencing facilitates precision medicine in paediatric rare disease patients and reduces healthcare costs , 2020, The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific.

[9]  N. Brown,et al.  Feasibility of Ultra-Rapid Exome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children With Suspected Monogenic Conditions in the Australian Public Health Care System. , 2020, JAMA.

[10]  Jane Tiller,et al.  Genetic testing and insurance in Australia. , 2019, Australian journal of general practice.

[11]  J. Savulescu,et al.  Rapid Challenges: Ethics and Genomic Neonatal Intensive Care , 2019, Pediatrics.

[12]  A. Elliott,et al.  The importance of genetic counselling in genome-wide sequencing , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  J. Bester.  The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics , 2018, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[14]  Shimul Chowdhury,et al.  The case for early use of rapid whole-genome sequencing in management of critically ill infants: late diagnosis of Coffin–Siris syndrome in an infant with left congenital diaphragmatic hernia, congenital heart disease, and recurrent infections , 2018, Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies.

[15]  S. Kingsmore,et al.  Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization , 2018, npj Genomic Medicine.

[16]  Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance,et al.  Meeting the challenges of implementing rapid genomic testing in acute pediatric care , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[17]  T. Douglas,et al.  Quarantine, isolation and the duty of easy rescue in public health , 2017, Developing world bioethics.

[18]  P. Davies,et al.  Knowledge brokerage and research utilisation: a discussion document prepared for the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing , 2017 .

[19]  C. Delany,et al.  When doctors and parents disagree: Ethics, paediatrics and the zone of parental discretion , 2017 .

[20]  L. Gillam.  The zone of parental discretion: An ethical tool for dealing with disagreement between parents and doctors about medical treatment for a child , 2016 .

[21]  M. J. Deem.  Whole-Genome Sequencing and Disability in the NICU: Exploring Practical and Ethical Challenges , 2016, Pediatrics.

[22]  Laurie D. Smith,et al.  Whole-Exome Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Neonates Suspected to Have Single-Gene Disorders. , 2016, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[23]  G. Birchley.  Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making , 2015, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[24]  J. Savulescu,et al.  Genomic intensive care: should we perform genome testing in critically ill newborns? , 2015, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[25]  S. McGuinness,et al.  Best Interests and Pragmatism , 2008, Health Care Analysis.

[26]  D. Diekema.  Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention , 2004, Theoretical medicine and bioethics.

[27]  S Holm,et al.  Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. , 2002 .

[28]  Arthur Ripstein.  Three Duties to Rescue: Moral, Civil, and Criminal , 2000 .

[29]  G. Albrecht,et al.  The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. , 1999, Social science & medicine.