Methodological sources of cultural insensitivity in mental health research.

The concept of procedural norms, which is taken from the analysis of science as an institutionally structured social process, is used to explain the persistence of cultural insensitivity in research. The concept refers to the canons of research that tell scientists what should be studied and how, and they are taught to successive generations of researchers. An examination of cross-cultural studies in mental health reveals that cultural insensitivity stems from procedural norms in the development of content validity based on experts' rational analysis of concepts, in linguistic translations that try to conform to the exact terms of standardized instruments, and in the uncritical transferring of concepts across cultures. We need a wide-ranging examination of our procedural norms, with the objective of keeping such norms from suppressing, biasing, or deflecting cultural understandings. This article proposes a dialogue on the intricate connections between culture and our customary methodologies.

[1]  A. Stepick,et al.  People in the Shadows: Survey Research among Haitians in Miami , 1990 .

[2]  L. H. Rogler.  Making sense of historical changes in the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: five propositions. , 1997, Journal of health and social behavior.

[3]  A. Kleinman.  Rethinking Psychiatry: From Cultural Category to Personal Experience , 1988 .

[4]  David W. Chapman,et al.  Translation Procedures for the Cross Cultural Use of Measurement Instruments , 1979 .

[5]  M. Rosenzweig.  U.S. psychology and world psychology. , 1984 .

[6]  A. B. Hollingshead,et al.  Trapped: Families and Schizophrenia , 1966 .

[7]  A. Gaw,et al.  Koro: proposed classification for DSM-IV. , 1990, The American journal of psychiatry.

[8]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Three Fragments From a Sociologist's Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials , 1987 .

[9]  Lee Sechrest,et al.  Problems of Translation in Cross-Cultural Research , 1972 .

[10]  S. Sue,et al.  Methodological issues in assessment research with ethnic minorities. , 1995 .

[11]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[12]  J. Wohl,et al.  Psychological Interventions and Cultural Diversity , 1995 .

[13]  N. Andreasen,et al.  Reliability of lifetime diagnosis. A multicenter collaborative perspective. , 1981, Archives of general psychiatry.

[14]  P. Reid.  The real problem in the study of culture. , 1994 .

[15]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Hermeneutics of personality description , 1986 .

[16]  L. Robins,et al.  National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. , 1981, Archives of general psychiatry.

[17]  L. H. Rogler.  Culture in psychiatric diagnosis: an issue of scientific accuracy. , 1993, Psychiatry.

[18]  R. Brislin,et al.  Cross-cultural perspectives on learning , 1975 .

[19]  L. H. Rogler.  Framing research on culture in psychiatric diagnosis: the case of the DSM-IV. , 1996, Psychiatry.

[20]  Leonore Loeb Adler,et al.  Cross-Cultural Topics in Psychology , 1994 .

[21]  M. Burnam,et al.  Development of the Spanish-language version of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. , 1983, Archives of general psychiatry.

[22]  E. Bernstein,et al.  Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. , 1986, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[23]  Why does American psychology have cultural limitations , 1994 .

[24]  P. Shrout,et al.  The prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in Puerto Rico. , 1987, Archives of general psychiatry.

[25]  R. Malgady,et al.  Hispanics and Mental Health: A Framework for Research , 1990 .

[26]  S. Manson.  Ethnographic Methods, Cultural Context, and Mental Illness: Bridging Different Ways of Knowing and Experience , 1997 .

[27]  E. Berkanovic.  The effect of inadequate language translation on Hispanics' responses to health surveys. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[28]  A. Kleinman.  Depression, somatization and the "new cross-cultural psychiatry". , 1977, Social science & medicine.

[29]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[30]  S. Eshleman,et al.  Amish Study, III: the impact of cultural factors on diagnosis of bipolar illness. , 1983, The American journal of psychiatry.

[31]  M. J. Allen.  Introduction to Measurement Theory , 1979 .

[32]  Dharma E. Cortés,et al.  Biculturality among Puerto Rican adults in the United States , 1994, American journal of community psychology.

[33]  Ellen W. Rowe,et al.  A history of intelligence test interpretation. , 1997 .

[34]  S. Manson,et al.  Psychiatric disorder among American Indian adolescents: prevalence in Northern Plains youth. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[35]  R. Lewis‐Fernández,et al.  Cultural Psychiatry: Theoretical, Clinical, and Research Issues , 1995 .

[36]  H. Zuckerman.  The sociology of science. , 1988 .

[37]  L. Radloff.  The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[38]  E. Robins,et al.  Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. , 1978, Archives of general psychiatry.

[39]  Ronald Jay Cohen,et al.  Psychological Testing: An Introduction to Tests & Measurement , 1989 .

[40]  G. Marín,et al.  Research with Hispanic Populations , 1991 .

[41]  F. Kortmann.  Psychiatric case finding in Ethiopia: Shortcomings of the self reporting questionnaire , 1990, Culture, medicine and psychiatry.

[42]  J. Maser,et al.  International use and attitudes toward DSM-III and DSM-III-R: growing consensus in psychiatric classification. , 1991, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[43]  A. Kleinman,et al.  Culture and depression. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  Héctor Betancourt,et al.  The Study of Culture, Ethnicity, and Race in American Psychology , 1993 .

[45]  M. Burnam,et al.  The Spanish Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Reliability and comparison with clinical diagnoses. , 1983, Archives of general psychiatry.

[46]  K. Gergen.  Social Psychology as History , 1973 .

[47]  R. Malgady,et al.  Acculturation and Mental Health Status Among Hispanics. Convergence and New Directions for Research , 1991 .

[48]  L. H. Rogler.  The meaning of culturally sensitive research in mental health. , 1989, The American journal of psychiatry.

[49]  M. E. Bernal,et al.  Are clinical psychologists prepared for service and research with ethnic minorities? Report of a decade of progress. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[50]  Ronald Cohen,et al.  A handbook of method in cultural anthropology , 1973 .

[51]  J. B. Pearson,et al.  Methodology in Social Research. , 1968 .

[52]  R. Malgady,et al.  The Mental Health Relevance of Idioms of Distress Anger and Perceptions of Injustice among New York Puerto Ricans , 1994, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[53]  W. Vega.  Theoretical and pragmatic implications of cultural diversity for community research , 1992 .

[54]  P. Shrout,et al.  The Spanish Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Reliability and concordance with clinical diagnoses in Puerto Rico. , 1987, Archives of general psychiatry.

[55]  Greenley.  Research in Community and Mental Health , 1995 .

[56]  L. H. Rogler.  Culturally Sensitizing Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Framework for Research , 1993, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[57]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Psychological Science in Cultural Context , 1996 .