Aging is associated with positive responding to neutral information but reduced recovery from negative information.

Studies on aging and emotion suggest an increase in reported positive affect, a processing bias of positive over negative information, as well as increasingly adaptive regulation in response to negative events with advancing age. These findings imply that older individuals evaluate information differently, resulting in lowered reactivity to, and/or faster recovery from, negative information, while maintaining more positive responding to positive information. We examined this hypothesis in an ongoing study on Midlife in the US (MIDUS II) where emotional reactivity and recovery were assessed in a large number of respondents (N = 159) from a wide age range (36-84 years). We recorded eye-blink startle magnitudes and corrugator activity during and after the presentation of positive, neutral and negative pictures. The most robust age effect was found in response to neutral stimuli, where increasing age is associated with a decreased corrugator and eyeblink startle response to neutral stimuli. These data suggest that an age-related positivity effect does not essentially alter the response to emotion-laden information, but is reflected in a more positive interpretation of affectively ambiguous information. Furthermore, older women showed reduced corrugator recovery from negative pictures relative to the younger women and men, suggesting that an age-related prioritization of well-being is not necessarily reflected in adaptive regulation of negative affect.

[1]  Michael Davis,et al.  Neural systems involved in fear and anxiety measured with fear-potentiated startle. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[2]  S. Folkman,et al.  Age differences in stress and coping processes. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[3]  L. Phillips,et al.  Emotional Development across Adulthood: Differential Age-Related Emotional Reactivity and Emotion Regulation in a Negative Mood Induction Procedure , 2007, International journal of aging & human development.

[4]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Corinna E Löckenhoff,et al.  Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: the increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[6]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Startle reflex and emotion modulation impairment after a right amygdala lesion. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  S. Wiens,et al.  Age effects to negative arousal differ for self-report and electrodermal activity. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[8]  W. Rinn,et al.  The neuropsychology of facial expression: a review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  P. Lang,et al.  The startle probe response: a new measure of emotion? , 1988, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  D. Mroczek,et al.  The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[12]  R. Lazarus,et al.  SHORT-CIRCUITING OF THREAT BY EXPERIMENTALLY ALTERING COGNITIVE APPRAISAL. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Charles H Hillman,et al.  Influences of age on emotional reactivity during picture processing. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[14]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Aging, emotion, and evolution: the bigger picture. , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Daniel Grühn,et al.  Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Do ratings become more extreme with age? , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[16]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Emotion and aging: experience, expression, and control. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[17]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. , 2001, Emotion.

[18]  B. Cuthbert,et al.  Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[19]  M. Bradley,et al.  Probing picture perception: activation and emotion. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[20]  J. Henry,et al.  Effective regulation of the experience and expression of negative affect in old age. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[21]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias , 2005 .

[22]  R. Lazarus,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL REDUCTION OF STRESS BASED ON EGO-DEFENSE THEORY. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[23]  Susanne Scheibe,et al.  Effects of regulating emotions on cognitive performance: what is costly for young adults is not so costly for older adults. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[25]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, novelty, and the startle reflex: habituation in humans. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  M. Mather,et al.  Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Autonomic, subjective, and expressive responses to emotional films in older and younger Chinese Americans and European Americans. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[28]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Anteromedial temporal lobe damage blocks startle modulation by fear and disgust. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  U. Kunzmann,et al.  Age differences in emotional reactivity: the sample case of sadness. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[30]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Individual Differences in Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activity are Associated with Evaluation Speed and Psychological Well-being , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Using developmental trajectories to understand developmental disorders. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  H. Wilson,et al.  Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[33]  F. Blanchard-Fields,et al.  Age differences in emotion-regulation strategies in handling everyday problems. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[34]  M K Kaiser,et al.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. , 1990, Psychological review.

[36]  Michael Davis,et al.  Lesions of the amygdala, but not of the cerebellum or red nucleus, block conditioned fear as measured with the potentiated startle paradigm. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  Maital Neta,et al.  Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias. , 2009, Emotion.

[38]  P. Ekman,et al.  Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[39]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[40]  F. Blanchard-Fields,et al.  Emotion regulation in interpersonal problems: the role of cognitive-emotional complexity, emotion regulation goals, and expressivity. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[41]  R. Davidson,et al.  Temporal stability of the emotion-modulated startle response. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[42]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  The evaluative space grid: A single-item measure of positivity and negativity , 2009 .

[43]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Now You Feel It, Now You Don't , 2003, Psychological science.

[44]  S. Vrana,et al.  Physiological response to a minimal social encounter: effects of gender, ethnicity, and social context. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Dan Foti,et al.  Deconstructing Reappraisal: Descriptions Preceding Arousing Pictures Modulate the Subsequent Neural Response , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  David M Almeida,et al.  Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: a daily diary study. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[47]  B. Shepard,et al.  Type A behavior pattern and emotion expression in younger and older adults. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[48]  U. Kunzmann,et al.  Behavioral inhibition and amplification during emotional arousal: a comparison of two age groups. , 2005, Psychology and aging.