Examination of thermoforming techniques to secure mouthguard thickness of the labial and buccal sides with a single sheet: An in vitro study.

BACKGROUND/AIM Mouthguards must have an appropriate thickness to prevent oral trauma during sports. The aim of this study was to establish a thermoforming technique to secure the labial and buccal thicknesses of the mouthguard with a single sheet. MATERIALS AND METHODS Mouthguards were thermoformed using 4.0-mm thick sheets manufactured by extrusion molding, a plaster model, and a vacuum forming machine. Two sheet installation conditions were compared: the sheet extrusion direction was either parallel (P) or vertical (V) to the model's centerline. In each extrusion direction, two forming conditions were compared: (1) the sheet was formed when it sagged 15-mm below the sheet frame at the top of the post (control group; C-P, C-V); and (2) the sheet frame was lowered 50-mm below the ordinary level and heated, the frame was lowered when it sagged 15-mm, and the model was moved forward 20-mm before formation (experimental group; E-P, E-V). Difference in thickness (incisal edge, labial surface, cusp, and buccal surface) due to sheet extrusion direction and forming conditions were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni method. RESULTS At all measurement sites, a significant difference in thickness depending on the sheet extrusion direction was observed in the experimental group (p < .01), but not in the control group. Difference in thickness depending on the forming condition was observed at all measurement sites, and the thickness was in the order C-P, C-V < E-P < E-V. Thicknesses of E-P and E-V were 3.01 ± 0.03 mm and 3.25 ± 0.02 mm on the labial surface, and 2.81 ± 0.02 mm and 3.02 ± 0.02 mm on the buccal surface. CONCLUSIONS It was possible to obtain 3 mm or more thickness on the labial and buccal sides with a single sheet by adjusting the sheet extrusion direction and the heating method of the sheet, and by applying the thermoforming method where the model is moved forward just before formation.

[1]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Biomechanical Behavior Evaluation of a Novel Hybrid Occlusal Splint-Mouthguard for Contact Sports: 3D-FEA , 2021, Dental journal.

[2]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Effect of acute angle model on mouthguard thickness with the thermoforming method and moving the model position just before fabrication. , 2020, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[3]  Ana M Sousa,et al.  Present Status in Polymeric Mouthguards. A Future Area for Additive Manufacturing? , 2020, Polymers.

[4]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Mouthguard use and TMJ injury prevention with different occlusions: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2020, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[5]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Thermoforming technique for suppressing reduction in mouthguard thickness: Part 2 Effect of model height and model moving distance. , 2020, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[6]  A. Versluis,et al.  Influence of impacted canines on the stress distribution during dental trauma with and without a mouthguard. , 2019, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[7]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Movement of model position just before vacuum forming to ensure mouthguard thickness: Part 2 Effect of model moving distance. , 2019, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[8]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Thermoforming method to effectively maintain mouthguard thickness: Effect of moving the model position just before vacuum formation , 2018, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[9]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Influence of custom‐made and stock mouthguard thickness on biomechanical response to a simulated impact , 2018, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[10]  P. Jost-Brinkmann,et al.  Comparison of the shock absorption capacities of different mouthguards , 2017, Dental Traumatology.

[11]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Effect of thermal shrinkage during thermoforming on the thickness of fabricated mouthguards: Part 2 pressure formation , 2017, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[12]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming – part 2: effect of the anteroposterior position of the model on mouthguard thickness , 2017, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[13]  A. Versluis,et al.  The effect of antagonist tooth contact on the biomechanical response of custom‐fitted mouthguards , 2017, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[14]  R. Gieleta,et al.  A comparison of impact force reduction by polymer materials used for mouthguard fabrication. , 2017, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[15]  P. Noritomi,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the sports mouthguard. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[16]  T. Coward,et al.  The effect of model inclination during fabrication on mouthguard calliper-measured and CT scan-assessed thickness. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[17]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Variation in mouthguard thickness according to heating conditions during fabrication Part 2: sheet shape and effect of thermal shrinkage. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[18]  A. Versluis,et al.  Custom-Fitted EVA Mouthguards: what is the ideal thickness? a dynamic finite element impact study. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[19]  S. Iwasaki,et al.  Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[20]  T. Coward,et al.  An investigation into the relationship between thickness variations and manufacturing techniques of mouthguards. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[21]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Investigation of vacuum forming techniques for reduction of loss in mouthguard thickness: part 2—effects of sheet grooving and thermal shrinkage. , 2015, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[22]  Dominika Gawlak,et al.  Assessment of custom and standard, self-adapted mouthguards in terms of comfort and users subjective impressions of their protective function. , 2015, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[23]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Variation in mouthguard thickness due to different heating conditions during fabrication: part 2. , 2015, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[24]  Mutsumi Takahashi,et al.  Thickness and fit of mouthguard according to changing the holding conditions and the heating conditions of the mouthguard sheet. , 2014, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[25]  M. Kinirons,et al.  Post thermoforming dimensional changes of ethylene vinyl acetate used in custom-made mouthguards for trauma prevention--a pilot study. , 2008, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[26]  Mami Shibusawa,et al.  In search of necessary mouthguard thickness. Part 1: From the viewpoint of shock absorption ability. , 2008, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi.

[27]  Gianluca Del Rossi,et al.  Fabricating a better mouthguard. Part I: factors influencing mouthguard thinning. , 2007, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[28]  J. Eccleston,et al.  EVA mouthguards: how thick should they be? , 2002, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[29]  P. Pfeiffer,et al.  Shock absorption capacities of mouthguards in different types and thicknesses. , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.