The covert interplay between perception and memory: event-related potential evidence.

Neurocognitive models of visual object identification have focussed on processes at the moment of identification, when perceivers can actually name what they see. Less well known is the timecourse of processes preceding and leading to actual identification. To track neuromental processes involved in visual identification, behavioral measures and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in two experiments prior to, during and after the identification of fragmented objects, half of which had been shown in their complete versions in a previous study phase. Each object was revealed in a sequence of frames wherein the object was represented by an increasingly less and less fragmented image up to the complete version. A shift in ERPs, around 300 ms and beyond, from negativity to positivity, marked the transition from non-identification to identification. However, while for new stimuli such a shift appeared abruptly from non-identification to identification, for recently-studied objects a late positive wave emerged in response to unidentified fragments at a level just prior to overt identification. Thus, ERPs reflected covert processes associated with a successful match between the current visual information and episodic recently-stored memory traces, which predicted overt identification.

[1]  Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al.  Fragmenting pictures on the apple macintosh computer for experimental and clinical applications , 1987 .

[2]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[3]  A. Treisman Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Functional Brain Imaging Studies of Cortical Mechanisms for Memory , 1995, Science.

[5]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[6]  Robert T. Wilkinson,et al.  EEG event-related potentials and signal detection , 1978, Biological Psychology.

[7]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology , 1985 .

[8]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[9]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Priming effects in picture fragment completion: support for the perceptual closure hypothesis. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  R. Leeper A Study of a Neglected Portion of the Field of Learning—the Development of Sensory Organization , 1935 .

[11]  H. Begleiter,et al.  Visual object priming differs from visual word priming: an ERP study. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Sagi,et al.  Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. , 1995, Science.

[13]  A. Treisman Perceiving and re-perceiving objects. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[14]  C. Koch,et al.  Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? , 1995, Nature.

[15]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Dissociations among implicit and explicit memory tasks: the role of stimulus similarity. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  D. Stuss,et al.  Perceptual closure and object identification: Electrophysiological responses to incomplete pictures , 1992, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  W. Sproul New Routes in the Preparation of Mechanically Hard Films , 1996, Science.

[18]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience , 1995 .

[19]  A. Neuren Visual Agnosia , 1991, Neurology.

[20]  H. Roediger Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[21]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[22]  Brain/behaviour dissociation on old/new distinction in a patient with amnesic syndrome. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.