Network Stability, Network Externalities and Technology Adoption

This paper investigates how the destabilizing of a social network may increase the scope of network externalities, using data on sales of a video-calling system made to an investment bank's employees and subsequent usage by these customers. The terrorist attacks of 2001 led potential customers in New York to start communicating with a new and less predictable set of people when their work teams were reorganized as a result of the physical displacement that resulted from the attacks. This did not happen in other comparable cities. These destabilized communication patterns were associated with potential adopters in New York being more likely to take into account a wider spectrum of the user base when deciding whether to adopt relative to those in other cities. Empirical analysis suggests that the aggregate effect of network externalities on adoption was doubled by this instability.

[1]  Catherine E. Tucker.  Identifying Formal and Informal Influence in Technology Adoption with Network Externalities , 2008 .

[2]  M. Sujan,et al.  Managing Consumer Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation , 2008 .

[3]  S. Kalish.  A New Product Adoption Model with Price, Advertising, and Uncertainty , 1985 .

[4]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  A note on international market leaders and networks of strategic technology partnering. , 1995 .

[5]  N. Bloom.  The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks , 2007 .

[6]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  Competitive strategy under uncertainty , 1987 .

[7]  Douglas J. Puffert.  Path Dependence in Spatial Networks: The Standardization of Railway Track Gauge , 2002 .

[8]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry , 2002 .

[9]  R. Jensen,et al.  Adoption and diffusion of an innovation of uncertain profitability , 1982 .

[10]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[11]  Arun Sundararajan.  Local Network Effects and Complex Network Structure , 2006 .

[12]  G. Tellis,et al.  Does Quality Win? Network Effects versus Quality in High-Tech Markets , 2009 .

[13]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[14]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[15]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs' co-location decisions , 2005 .

[16]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  Tipping and Concentration in Markets with Indirect Network Effects , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[17]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Chapter 31 Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects , 2007 .

[18]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[19]  Garth Saloner,et al.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Adoption of Technologies Uith Network Effects: an Empirical Examination of the Adoption of Automated Teller Machines , 2022 .

[20]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Local Network Effects and Network Structure , 2005 .

[21]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-Time Duration Models , 1995 .

[22]  C. Manski.  Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[23]  Stephen P. Ryan,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HETEROGENEITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION , 2011 .

[24]  G. Gowrisankaran,et al.  Network Externalities and Technology Adoption: Lessons from Electronic Payments , 2002 .