Clever approaches to intriguing questions: halcyon days of carotid body research by one of the best

In 1993, I was in the first year of my doctoral training at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, exploring upper airway reflex control of breathing and airway patency. The 12th Congress of the International Society for Arterial Chemoreception (ISAC) was hosted in Dublin that year. Carotid body physiology was flourishing with intense debate of the diminutive enigmatic structure. In the mix was the quietly spoken, sharp-minded Gerald (Jerry) E. Bisgard. Earlier that year, the Wisconsin group had published in The Journal of Physiology (Smith et al., 1993) the latest observations in a fascinating series of studies. I was intrigued by the experimental model, the goat, and the use of a clever experimental approach, surgically isolating the carotid body, and independently controlling gas tensions perfusing the structure by means of an extracorporeal circuit, with denervation of the contralateral organ (Busch et al., 1985). This allowed for examination in awake animals of the ventilatory effects of stimuli isolated to the carotid body or the whole-animal (brain). Importantly, maximal activation of the aortic bodies in the goat produces no ventilatory effects (Weizhen et al., 1992). The goat, which I would later study as a post-doctoral fellow in Bisgard’s group, is an excellent model

[1]  T. Simonson,et al.  Neuronal HIF‐1α in the nucleus tractus solitarius contributes to ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia , 2020, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  G. Semenza,et al.  The role of hypoxia‐inducible factors in carotid body (patho) physiology , 2018, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  G. Funk,et al.  CrossTalk proposal: a central hypoxia sensor contributes to the excitatory hypoxic ventilatory response , 2018, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  L. Teppema CrossTalk opposing view: the hypoxic ventilatory response does not include a central, excitatory hypoxia sensing component , 2018, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Richard J. A. Wilson,et al.  CrossTalk opposing view: Peripheral and central chemoreceptors have hypoadditive effects on respiratory motor output , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Duffin,et al.  CrossTalk opposing view: Peripheral and central chemoreflexes have additive effects on ventilation in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  L. Teppema,et al.  CrossTalk opposing view: Peripheral and central chemoreceptors have hyperadditive effects on respiratory motor control , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M. Dwinell,et al.  Effects of carotid body hypocapnia during ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Effects of specific carotid body and brain hypoxia on respiratory muscle control in the awake goat. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  G. Bisgard,et al.  Ventilatory effects of prolonged systemic (CNS) hypoxia in awake goats. , 1992, Respiration physiology.

[11]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Ventilatory afterdischarge in the awake goat. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  A. Berssenbrugge,et al.  The effects of carotid body hypocapnia on ventilation in goats. , 1990, Respiration physiology.

[13]  A. Berssenbrugge,et al.  Hypoxic-hypercapnic ventilatory interaction at the carotid body of awake goats. , 1987, Respiration physiology.

[14]  H. Forster,et al.  Carotid body hypercapnia does not elicit ventilatory acclimatization in goats. , 1986, Respiration physiology.

[15]  H. Forster,et al.  Ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia is not dependent on cerebral hypocapnic alkalosis. , 1986, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  H. Forster,et al.  Ventilatory acclimatization to hypoxia is not dependent on arterial hypoxemia. , 1985, Journal of applied physiology.