The tie that divides: Cross‐national evidence of the primacy of partyism

Using evidence from Great Britain, the United States, Belgium and Spain, it is demonstrated in this article that in integrated and divided nations alike, citizens are more strongly attached to political parties than to the social groups that the parties represent. In all four nations, partisans discriminate against their opponents to a degree that exceeds discrimination against members of religious, linguistic, ethnic or regional out-groups. This pattern holds even when social cleavages are intense and the basis for prolonged political conflict. Partisan animus is conditioned by ideological proximity; partisans are more distrusting of parties furthest from them in the ideological space. The effects of partisanship on trust are eroded when partisan and social ties collide. In closing, the article considers the reasons that give rise to the strength of ‘partyism’ in modern democracies.

[1]  S. Iyengar,et al.  All in the Eye of the Beholder , 2018 .

[2]  S. Westwood,et al.  The Limits of Partisan Prejudice , 2017, The Journal of Politics.

[3]  Wayne E. Lee Culture of War , 2016 .

[4]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization , 2015 .

[5]  Luis Miller,et al.  Ethnicity and Trust: A Multifactorial Experiment , 2015 .

[6]  L. Huddy,et al.  Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity , 2015, American Political Science Review.

[7]  Kristin Michelitch Does Electoral Competition Exacerbate Interethnic or Interpartisan Economic Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Market Price Bargaining , 2015, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Frank Stevens,et al.  Look how far we've come , 2014 .

[9]  Geoffrey Evans,et al.  Book Review: Comparative: Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-national Perspective , 2014, Political Studies Review.

[10]  Christopher P. Muste Reframing Polarization: Social Groups and “Culture Wars” , 2014, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[11]  Ryan E. Carlin,et al.  The Politics of Interpersonal Trust and Reciprocity: An Experimental Approach , 2013 .

[12]  Oliver Strijbis,et al.  Political Cleavages in the Basque Country: Meaning and Salience , 2012 .

[13]  James Tilley,et al.  The Depoliticization of Inequality and Redistribution: Explaining the Decline of Class Voting , 2012 .

[14]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization , 2012 .

[15]  J. Gubler,et al.  Horizontal Inequality, Crosscutting Cleavages, and Civil War , 2012 .

[16]  James Adams,et al.  Has the British Public Depolarized Along With Political Elites? An American Perspective on British Public Opinion , 2012 .

[17]  J. Selway The Measurement of Cross-cutting Cleavages and Other Multidimensional Cleavage Structures , 2011, Political Analysis.

[18]  Alexandra A. Mislin,et al.  Trust games: A meta-analysis , 2011 .

[19]  James Tilley,et al.  How Parties Shape Class Politics: Explaining the Decline of the Class Basis of Party Support , 2011, British Journal of Political Science.

[20]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer,et al.  Do fairness and race matter in generosity? Evidence from a nationally representative charity experiment , 2011 .

[21]  David Sanders,et al.  Downs, Stokes and the Dynamics of Electoral Choice , 2011, British Journal of Political Science.

[22]  Matthew Levendusky Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization , 2010 .

[23]  C. D. Vries EU Issue voting; asset or liability: How European integration affects parties' electoral fortunes , 2010 .

[24]  T. Dunning,et al.  Cross-cutting Cleavages and Ethnic Voting: An Experimental Study of Cousinage in Mali , 2010, American Political Science Review.

[25]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Is Polarization a Myth? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[26]  Janet T. Knoedler Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches , 2008 .

[27]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision? , 2007, American Political Science Review.

[28]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[29]  Sam Whitt,et al.  The Dictator Game, Fairness and Ethnicity in Postwar Bosnia , 2007 .

[30]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches , 2006 .

[31]  J. Thomassen The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies , 2005 .

[32]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[33]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[34]  D. Green,et al.  Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters , 2002 .

[35]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Trust and discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach , 2001 .

[36]  W. Field Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-term Perspective , 2000 .

[37]  Norman J. Ornstein,et al.  The Permanent Campaign and Its Future , 2000 .

[38]  S. Greene Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach , 1999 .

[39]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Are Women Less Selfish Than Men?: Evidence From Dictator Experiments , 1998 .

[40]  G. Cox Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems , 1997 .

[41]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[42]  B. Richardson European Party Loyalties Revisited , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[43]  W. Doise Individual and social identities in intergroup relations , 1988 .

[44]  I. Crewe The Decline of Class Voting in Britain: Changes in the Basis of Electoral Choice, 1964–1983. By Franklin Mark N.. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985. Pp. xii + 194. $34.50, cloth; $14.95, paper.) , 1986 .

[45]  I. Balbus Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control . By Robert A. Dahl. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982. Pp. xi, 229. $18.50.) , 1983 .

[46]  Samuel Himmelfarb,et al.  Social desirability and the randomized response technique. , 1982 .

[47]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? , 1980 .

[48]  J. Linz,et al.  The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes , 1978 .

[49]  W. Chambers,et al.  The American party systems : stages of political development , 1975 .

[50]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Current Stereotypes: A Little Fading, a Little Faking. , 1971 .

[51]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Aspects of national and ethnic loyalty , 1970 .

[52]  Abend Lijphart,et al.  Typologies of Democratic Systems , 1968 .

[53]  S. Verba Organizational Membership and Democratic Consensus , 1965, The Journal of Politics.

[54]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[55]  V. Key Secular Realignment and the Party System , 1959, The Journal of Politics.

[56]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect , 2017 .

[57]  Lilliana Mason,et al.  “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization , 2015 .

[58]  D. Cutts,et al.  What Drives Anti-Muslim Sentiment? A Test of Rival Theories , 2011 .

[59]  S. Holmberg,et al.  Party Identification and Party Choice , 2005 .

[60]  A. Alesina,et al.  Fractionalization * , 2002 .

[61]  Susan C. Stokes,et al.  Democracy, Accountability, and Representation: Subject Index , 1999 .

[62]  M. Shugart,et al.  Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America: Acknowledgments , 1997 .

[63]  R. Dalton Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies , 1996 .

[64]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, reciprocity and social history’, Games and Economic Behaviour, . , 1995 .

[65]  S. Bartolini,et al.  Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985 , 1990 .

[66]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[67]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[68]  N. Maccoby,et al.  The interview: a tool of social science , 1954 .