The Diameter of Melanomas

BACKGROUND The mnemonic ABCD, which stands for asymmetry, border irregularity, color variation, and diameter greater than 6 mm alerts physicians to features that suggest melanoma. Although the ABCD criteria are guidelines for diagnosis, clinicians may overlook many melanomas that do not follow the ABCD rule. OBJECTIVE We examined the sensitivity of the diameter portion of the ABCD rule. METHODS Retrospective study examining the pathology reports of 383 melanomas. Data were compiled for each melanoma regarding its diameter, depth, body location, patient age, and sex. A 95% confidence interval (p=0.05) was used to identify the proportion of melanomas less than or equal to 6 mm in diameter. A two-tailed p value approach (p value =0.05, degrees of freedom=28) was used when evaluating two independent populations, lesions less than or equal to 6 mm and lesions greater than 6 mm in diameter. RESULTS A total of 38.21% of melanomas were less than or equal to 6 mm in diameter after processing. Melanomas greater than 6 mm in diameter occurred in significantly older patients and at a greater Breslow's thickness than smaller melanomas. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that a significant proportion of melanomas may be smaller than 6 mm. The ABCD criteria are not absolute; melanomas have many different appearances and start as small lesions.

[1]  B Gerbert,et al.  Primary care physicians as gatekeepers in managed care. Primary care physicians' and dermatologists' skills at secondary prevention of skin cancer. , 1996, Archives of dermatology.

[2]  L. Thomas,et al.  Semiological Value of ABCDE Criteria in the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Pigmented Tumors , 1998, Dermatology.

[3]  D. Brodland,et al.  Overview of skin cancer detection and prevention for the primary care physician. , 2000, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[5]  G. Milton,et al.  Melanoma: Accuracy of clinical diagnosis , 1998, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[6]  H Kerl,et al.  Sensitivity in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma , 1994, Melanoma research.

[7]  J. Carlson,et al.  Shrinkage of skin excision specimens and downcoding. , 2003, Archives of dermatology.

[8]  J. Whited,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a mole or a melanoma? , 1998, JAMA.

[9]  Mackie,et al.  Clinical accuracy of the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  D. Silvers,et al.  'Melanoma? It can't be melanoma!' A subset of melanomas that defies clinical recognition. , 1991, JAMA.

[11]  A. Halpern,et al.  Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma , 2000, Cancer.

[12]  J. Toribio,et al.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome and generalized pustular psoriasis: another case report. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  C. Grin,et al.  The misdiagnosis of malignant melanoma. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  C. Grin,et al.  Accuracy in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma. , 1990, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  The dangers of atypical mole (dysplastic nevus) syndrome. Teaching at-risk patients to protect themselves from melanoma. , 1999, Postgraduate medicine.

[16]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Small melanomas: a clinical study on 270 consecutive cases of cutaneous melanoma. , 1999, Melanoma research.

[17]  A. Sober,et al.  Clinical recognition of melanoma and its precursors. , 1998, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[18]  R. Jackson,et al.  Malignant melanoma: a review of 75 malpractice cases , 1997, International journal of dermatology.

[19]  L. Golitz Resolving Quandaries in Dermatology, Pathology and Dermatopathology , 1997 .

[20]  A. Kopf,et al.  Early detection of malignant melanoma: The role of physician examination and self‐examination of the skin , 1985, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  J. Grob,et al.  The 'ugly duckling' sign: identification of the common characteristics of nevi in an individual as a basis for melanoma screening. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[22]  J. Bourke,et al.  An evaluation of the revised seven‐point checklist for the early diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma , 1994, The British journal of dermatology.

[23]  Lin Fritschi,et al.  Nodular melanoma: patients' perceptions of presenting features and implications for earlier detection. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[24]  J. Kenealy,et al.  A 6 year prospective analysis of the diagnosis of malignant melanoma in a pigmented-lesion clinic: even the experts miss malignant melanomas, but not often. , 2001, British journal of plastic surgery.

[25]  J C Briggs,et al.  Cutaneous melanoma. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[26]  M. Litaker,et al.  Clinical predictors of malignant pigmented lesions. A comparison of the Glasgow seven-point checklist and the American Cancer Society's ABCDs of pigmented lesions. , 1992, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[27]  C. Cockerell,et al.  Histologic features and sensitivity of diagnosis of clinically unsuspected cutaneous melanoma. , 1991, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[28]  I Olkin,et al.  A comparison of dermatologists' and primary care physicians' accuracy in diagnosing melanoma: a systematic review. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.