The effects of inter-industry and country difference in supplier relationships on pioneering innovations

Innovations are critical driving forces for firms to engage in corporate growth and new business development. Innovating firms are increasingly generating new knowledge in collaboration with partners. In this paper, we analyze how the knowledge differences between the innovating firms and their suppliers in Canada are likely to result in pioneering innovations. The knowledge difference is decomposed into two dimensions: the inter-industrial dimension and the geographic dimension in national context. Using the Canadian Innovation database, we found the inter-industry difference has a positive effect and the country difference has a negative effect on the likelihood of generating pioneering innovation. The findings of this paper suggest that for generating pioneering innovation, it is important not only to search for suppliers from different industries to get access to various complementary external knowledge sources but also to find suppliers from the same or nearby countries for the sake of communication and coordination.

[1]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[2]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[3]  Douglas W. LaBahn,et al.  Early Supplier Involvement In Customer New Product Development: A Contingency Model Of Component Supplier Intentions , 2000 .

[4]  F. Wynstra,et al.  Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a portfolio approach , 2000 .

[5]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[6]  M. Freel,et al.  Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity , 2003 .

[7]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[8]  G. M. Duijsters,et al.  Understanding novelty creation in exploration networks, structural and relational embeddedness jointly considered , 2008 .

[9]  김종식.  동아시아 문화와 경영, Geert Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, 1980) ; and Cultures and Organizations : Software of the Mind (New York:McGraw-Hill, 1997) , 1999 .

[10]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[11]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[12]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2004 .

[13]  B. Nooteboom.  Inter-Firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An Integrated Approach , 2003 .

[14]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance , 2008 .

[15]  Jeffrey H. Dyer.  Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[16]  H. Håkansson.  International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach , 1982 .

[17]  G. Kress.  PARTICIPATION AND DIFFERENCE: The Role of Language in Producing a Culture of Innovation , 1992 .

[18]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Innovation: Reframing the Interpretation , 2008 .

[19]  B. Dalum.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[20]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Borderless World , 1990 .

[21]  P. Williamson,et al.  Is Your Innovation Process Global , 2004 .

[22]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Bridging inter‐ and intra‐firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 2001 .

[23]  K. Morgan.  The Exaggerated Death of Geography , 2004, Geography.

[24]  R. Nelson.  Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .

[25]  Jyf Wynstra,et al.  Purchasing involvement in product development , 1998 .

[26]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[27]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[28]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Inter-firm alliances: Analysis and design , 1999 .

[29]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[30]  Stefano Usai,et al.  International patenting and national technological specialization , 1997 .

[31]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Organizational Impact of Technological Change: A Comparative Theory of National Institutional Factors , 1999 .

[32]  D G Gillespie.  A source of innovation. , 1992, Integration.

[33]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[34]  John C. Narver,et al.  Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship? , 1994 .

[35]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[36]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[37]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[38]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[39]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation , 1997 .

[40]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003 , 2006 .

[41]  Shih-Chia Chang,et al.  Supplier involvement and manufacturing flexibility , 2006 .

[42]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance , 2004 .

[43]  R. Handfield,et al.  Involving Suppliers in New Product Development , 1999 .

[44]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Understanding Acquisition Performance: The Role of Transfer Effects , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Tarun Khanna,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights and Contract Structure , 1996 .

[46]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: the story of Hewlett‐Packard's thermal ink‐jet , 2002 .

[47]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[49]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Innovation: Location Matters , 2001 .

[50]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[51]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Learning in Dynamic Inter-Firm Networks: The Efficacy of Multiple Contacts , 2002 .

[52]  S. Park,et al.  The Effect of National Culture, Organizational Complementarity, and Economic Motivation on Joint Venture Dissolution , 1997 .

[53]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[54]  Toby E. Stuart.  Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[55]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[56]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[57]  A. Romeo.  Interindustry and Interfirm Differences in the Rate of Diffusion of an Innovation , 1975 .

[58]  B. Lundvall.  Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction , 1985 .

[59]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[60]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[61]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[62]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[63]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[64]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[65]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[66]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[67]  Subhash C. Lonial,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on the Market Orientation - Performance Relationship: A Study of the Hospital Industry ? , 2001 .

[68]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[69]  J. Workman,et al.  Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms , 2004 .

[70]  Ian Clark,et al.  A ‘Borderless World’? , 2000 .

[71]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[72]  W. Shan.  An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms , 1990 .

[73]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ALLIANCE NETWORK DIVERSITY ON MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[74]  N. Caldwell,et al.  Centrality of customer and supplier interaction in innovation , 2006 .

[75]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .

[76]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[77]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Uneven growth between interdependent economies : an evolutionary view on technology gaps, trade and growth , 1994 .

[78]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[79]  Pierre-Xavier Meschi,et al.  Country risk, national cultural differences between partners and survival of international joint ventures in Brazil , 2008 .

[80]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[81]  Raimar Richers.  The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[82]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[83]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[84]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[85]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[86]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[87]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[88]  Liliana Herrera,et al.  The national innovation policy effect according to firm location , 2008 .

[89]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures , 2005 .

[90]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[91]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Organizations , 2006 .

[92]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Don't Integrate Your Acquisitions, Partner with Them , 2009 .

[93]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[94]  Martin Steffen,et al.  Author ' s personal copy ARTICLE IN PRESS , 2009 .

[95]  Yang Jian-hua,et al.  The Source of Innovation , 2005 .

[96]  M. Nieto,et al.  The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation , 2007 .

[97]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[98]  John C. Narver,et al.  Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?: , 1994 .