The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Continuance Intention

abstract In this study, we investigate the influence of two external influences i.e., Ease of finding and Computer anxiety on the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the continuance intention of using a popular course management system (CMS): WebCT. The study used a sample of 72 students that have experience using the software. The students came from four local higher education institutions. In order to study nature of the relationships among the constructs, eight (8) hypotheses were formulated and tested using a structural equation modeling technique: Partial Least Squares (PLS). The predictive power of the model was adequate and the study found support for seven of eight hypotheses. Regarding the impact of the antecedents on continuance intention in the use of technology, the results offer the following insights: when computer anxiety is low, students are able to use the system without much difficulty, and are likely to continue to use CMS in the future. Similarly, students will continue the tool as long as they find it easy to navigate. Perhaps due to contextual factors, the data did not support the relationship between Perceived usefulness and Usage. This particular finding is at variance with the TAM's results and viewpoint. The study's implications for research and practice are succinctly outlined.

[1]  Dean A. Morss,et al.  A study of student perspectives on Web-based learning: WebCT in the classroom , 1999, Internet Res..

[2]  Kristin Nölting,et al.  Is e-Learning the Solution for Individual Learning?. , 2004 .

[3]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  C. Keller,et al.  Students’ Perceptions of E‐learning in University Education , 2002 .

[5]  Michael G. Morris,et al.  Assessing users' subjective quality of experience with the world wide web: an exploratory examination of temporal changes in technology acceptance , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Princely Ifinedo,et al.  Uncertainties and Risks in the Implementation of an E-Learning Information Systems Project in a Higher-Learning Environment: Viewpoints from Estonia , 2005, J. Inf. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[9]  I. Brown.  Individual and Technological Factors Affecting Perceived Ease of Use of Web‐based Learning Technologies in a Developing Country , 2002, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[10]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[12]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[13]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[14]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[16]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  IT acceptance in a less-developed country: a motivational factor perspective , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[18]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Information Age Confronts Education: Case Studies on Electronic Classrooms , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Lin Lin,et al.  Wrestling With Online Learning Technologies: Blind Students' Struggle to Achieve Academic Success , 2010, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[20]  Cheng-Chang Sam Pan,et al.  Students' Attitude in a Web-enhanced Hybrid Course: A Structural Equaadon Modeling Inquiry , 2003 .

[21]  Michael G. Morris,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Theories and Models , 1996 .

[22]  Princely Ifinedo,et al.  Investigating the Antecedents of Continuance Intention of Course Management Systems Use among Estonian Undergraduates , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[23]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  Chang Liu,et al.  Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Hsiu-Li Liao,et al.  Factors influencing the adoption of e-learning websites: an empirical study , 2005 .

[28]  P. Ifinedo.  Acceptance and Continuance Intention of Web‐based Learning Technologies (WLT) Use among University Students in a Baltic Country , 2006, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[29]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[30]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes toward Microcomputers , 1989 .

[31]  Jae-Shin Lee,et al.  Technology Acceptance and Social Networking in Distance Learning , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  A longitudinal investigation of continued online shopping behavior: An extension of the theory of planned behavior , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.