Earthquake response of isolated cable-stayed bridges under spatially varying ground motions

A comprehensive investigation of the stochastic response of an isolated cable-stayed bridge subjected to spatially varying earthquake ground motion is performed. In this study, the Jindo Bridge built in South Korea is chosen as a numerical example. The bridge deck is assumed to be continuous from one end to the other end. The vertical movement of the stiffening girder is restrained and freedom of rotational movement on the transverse axis is provided for all piers and abutments. The longitudinal restraint is provided at the mainland pier. The A-frame towers are fixed at the base. To implement the base isolation procedure, the double concave friction pendulum bearings are placed at each of the four support points of the deck. Thus, the deck of the cable-stayed bridge is isolated from the towers using the double concave friction pendulum bearings which are sliding devices that utilize two spherical concave surfaces. The spatially varying earthquake ground motion is characterized by the incoherence and wave-passage effects. Mean of maximum response values obtained from the spatially varying earthquake ground motion case are compared for the isolated and non-isolated bridge models. It is pointed out that the base isolation of the considered cable-stayed bridge model subjected to the spatially varying earthquake ground motion significantly underestimates the deck and the tower responses.

[1]  Zbigniew Zembaty,et al.  On the sensitivity of bridge seismic response with local soil amplification , 1998 .

[2]  A. Kiureghian A COHERENCY MODEL FOR SPATIALLY VARYING GROUND MOTIONS , 1996 .

[3]  A. A. Dumanoglu,et al.  Spatial variability effects of ground motions on cable-stayed bridges , 2004 .

[4]  Aspasia Zerva,et al.  Effects of spatially variable ground motions on the seismic response of a skewed, multi-span, RC highway bridge , 2005 .

[5]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Passive hybrid systems for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge , 2007 .

[6]  Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION FOR CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES USING PASSIVE DEVICES , 1994 .

[7]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable‐stayed bridges , 1992 .

[8]  A. A. Dumanoglu,et al.  The effect of spatially varying earthquake ground motions on the stochastic response of bridges isolated with friction pendulum systems , 2006 .

[9]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Seismic isolation of cable‐stayed bridges for near‐field ground motions , 2003 .

[10]  John F. Fleming,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of a cable‐stayed bridge , 1980 .

[11]  Kyu-Sik Park,et al.  Hybrid seismic protection of cable‐stayed bridges , 2004 .

[12]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Kinematic soil–structure interaction for long‐span cable‐supported bridges , 1993 .

[13]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Behaviour of the double concave Friction Pendulum bearing , 2006 .

[14]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Non-linear earthquake-response analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridges: Theory , 1990 .

[15]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  Stochastic seismic response of Keban dam by the finite element method , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[16]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Effects of Isolation Damping on Stochastic Response of Structures with Nonlinear Base Isolators , 1998 .

[17]  E. Vanmarcke,et al.  Stochastic Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion in Space and Time , 1986 .

[18]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  Stochastic response of seismically isolated highway bridges with friction pendulum systems to spatially varying earthquake ground motions , 2005 .

[19]  M. C. Constantinou,et al.  Stochastic response of practical sliding isolation systems , 1990 .

[20]  Ronald S. Harichandran,et al.  RESPONSE OF LONG-SPAN BRIDGES TO SPATIALLY VARYING GROUND MOTION , 1996 .

[21]  Dinar Camotim,et al.  GBT-BASED LOCAL AND GLOBAL VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF LOADED COMPOSITE OPEN-SECTION THIN-WALLED MEMBERS , 2006 .

[22]  F. Perotti Structural response to non‐stationary multiple‐support random excitation , 1990 .

[23]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Non‐linear earthquake‐response analysis of long‐span cable‐stayed bridges: Applications , 1990 .

[24]  A. A. Dumanoglu,et al.  Stochastic response of suspension bridges to earthquake forces , 1990 .

[25]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic control of cable-stayed bridge using semi-active hybrid system , 2006 .

[26]  C. S. Tsai,et al.  Component and shaking table tests for full‐scale multiple friction pendulum system , 2006 .