An adaptive global variable fidelity metamodeling strategy using a support vector regression based scaling function

Abstract Computational simulation models with variable fidelity have been widely used in complex systems design. However, running the most accurate simulation models tends to be very time-consuming and can therefore only be used sporadically, while incorporating less accurate, inexpensive models into the design process may result in inaccurate design alternatives. To make a trade-off between high accuracy and low expense, variable fidelity (VF) metamodeling approaches that aim to integrate information from both low-fidelity (LF) and high-fidelity (HF) models have gained increasing popularity. In this paper, an adaptive global VF metamodeling approach named difference adaptive decreasing variable-fidelity metamodeling (DAD-VFM) is proposed, in which the one-shot VF metamodeling process is transformed into an iterative process to utilize the already-acquired information of difference characteristics between the HF and LF models. In DAD-VFM, support vector regression (SVR) is adopted to map the difference between the HF and LF models. Besides, a generalized objective-oriented sampling strategy is introduced to adaptively probe and sample more points in the interesting regions where the differences between the HF and LF models are multi-model, non-smooth and have abrupt changes. Several numerical cases and a long cylinder pressure vessel optimization design problem verify the applicability of the proposed VF metamodeling approach.

[1]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Alternative Cokriging Method for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling , 2012 .

[2]  Abdollah Homaifar,et al.  Constrained Optimization Via Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Simul..

[3]  Wei Chen,et al.  Optimizing Latin hypercube design for sequential sampling of computer experiments , 2009 .

[4]  Xiao Jian Zhou,et al.  Ensemble of surrogates with recursive arithmetic average , 2011 .

[5]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function , 2013 .

[6]  Manoj Tripathy Power transformer differential protection using neural network Principal Component Analysis and Radial Basis Function Neural Network , 2010, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[7]  Dick den Hertog,et al.  Maximin Latin Hypercube Designs in Two Dimensions , 2007, Oper. Res..

[8]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  A Rational Design Approach to Gaussian Process Modeling for Variable Fidelity Models , 2011, DAC 2011.

[9]  Tom Dhaene,et al.  Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Building Surrogate Models Based on Detailed and Approximate , 2004, DAC 2004.

[11]  Shawn E. Gano,et al.  Hybrid Variable Fidelity Optimization by Using a Kriging-Based Scaling Function , 2005 .

[12]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodeling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: How Far Have We Really Come? , 2014 .

[13]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Derivative-Enhanced Variable Fidelity Surrogate Modeling for Aerodynamic Functions , 2013 .

[14]  J. Sargolzaei,et al.  Modeling and simulation of wind turbine Savonius rotors using artificial neural networks for estimation of the power ratio and torque , 2009, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[15]  A. Sudjianto,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Constructing Optimal Design of Computer Experiments , 2005, DAC 2003.

[16]  Alexander I. J. Forrester,et al.  Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: A Review of How Far We Have Come - Or Not , 2008 .

[18]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Approximation and Model Management in Aerodynamic Optimization with Variable-Fidelity Models , 2001 .

[19]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Response surface methodology for constrained simulation optimization: An overview , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[20]  R. Lewis,et al.  An Overview of First-Order Model Management for Engineering Optimization , 2001 .

[21]  Daniel M. Dunlavy,et al.  Formulations for Surrogate-Based Optimization with Data Fit, Multifidelity, and Reduced-Order Models , 2006 .

[22]  Liang Gao,et al.  A hybrid variable-fidelity global approximation modelling method combining tuned radial basis function base and kriging correction , 2013 .

[23]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Variable Fidelity Optimization Using a Kriging Based Scaling Function , 2004 .

[24]  E. Acar Various approaches for constructing an ensemble of metamodels using local measures , 2010 .

[25]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems , 2000 .

[27]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions , 2010 .

[28]  T. Simpson,et al.  Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses , 2005, DAC 2003.

[29]  Shawn E. Gano,et al.  Update strategies for kriging models used in variable fidelity optimization , 2006 .

[30]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Sensitivity-based scaling for approximating. Structural response , 1993 .

[31]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  A modified variable complexity modeling for efficient multidisciplinary aircraft conceptual design , 2015 .

[32]  Robert Hewson,et al.  Multifidelity metamodel building as a route to aeroelastic optimization of flexible wings , 2011 .

[33]  Vassili Toropov,et al.  Metamodel-based collaborative optimization framework , 2009 .

[34]  Reinhard Radermacher,et al.  Cross-validation based single response adaptive design of experiments for Kriging metamodeling of deterministic computer simulations , 2013 .

[35]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Hierarchical Kriging Model for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling , 2012 .

[36]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Variable-fidelity model selection for stochastic simulation , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  Konstantinos I. Diamantaras,et al.  A comparison of machine learning techniques for customer churn prediction , 2015, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[38]  Wei Chen,et al.  A New Variable-Fidelity Optimization Framework Based on Model Fusion and Objective-Oriented Sequential Sampling , 2007, DAC 2007.

[39]  M. Tyan,et al.  Improving variable-fidelity modelling by exploring global design space and radial basis function networks for aerofoil design , 2015 .

[40]  Dirk Gorissen,et al.  A Novel Hybrid Sequential Design Strategy for Global Surrogate Modeling of Computer Experiments , 2011, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[41]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007 .

[42]  Guangyao Li,et al.  Variable fidelity design based surrogate and artificial bee colony algorithm for sheet metal forming process , 2012 .