Review and Appraisal

Choice between alternative flexible functional forms has received little explicit treatment in many empirical agricultural studies. Theoretical criteria and empirical techniques for choosing between flexible functional forms are reviewed. Theoretical topics include definitions of flexibility, mathematical expansions, separability, and regular regions. Empirical techniques examined are Monte Carlo analysis, parametric modeling, bayesian inference, and nonnested hypothesis testing. Comparison of the full range of theoretical and empirical aspects may provide more credible and reliable empirical estimates when consumer or producer duality assumptions are appropriate in agricultural applications.

[1]  William A. Barnett,et al.  The three-dimensional global properties of the minflex laurent, generalized leontief, and translog flexible functional forms , 1985 .

[2]  Terence J. Wales,et al.  On the flexibility of flexible functional forms : An empirical approach , 1977 .

[3]  P. Simmons,et al.  Translog Flexible Functional Forms and Associated Demand Systems , 1979 .

[4]  S. S. Sidhu,et al.  Estimating Farm-Level Input Demand and Wheat Supply in the Indian Punjab Using a Translog Profit Function , 1981 .

[5]  M. Wohlgenant Conceptual and Functional Form Issues in Estimating Demand Elasticities for Food , 1984 .

[6]  K. R. Kadiyala On Production Functions and Elasticity of Substitution , 1972 .

[7]  Michael Denny,et al.  The Use of Approximation Analysis to Test for Separability and the Existence of Consistent Aggregates , 1977 .

[8]  David Zilberman,et al.  Estimation of Multicrop Production Functions , 1983 .

[9]  W. Diewert,et al.  Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions , 1989 .

[10]  A. Gallant,et al.  Estimating substitution elasticities with the Fourier cost function : Some Monte Carlo results , 1985 .

[11]  Lawrence J. Lau,et al.  Applications of Profit Functions , 1978 .

[12]  Peter E. Rossi Comparison of Alternative Functional Forms in Production , 1985 .

[13]  H. White Using Least Squares to Approximate Unknown Regression Functions , 1980 .

[14]  P. Douglas The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  W. Diewert,et al.  Dynamic econometric modeling: Flexible functional forms for profit functions and global curvature conditions , 1988 .

[16]  Leslie Godfrey,et al.  Tests of non-nested regression models: Small sample adjustments and Monte Carlo evidence , 1983 .

[17]  B. Dixon,et al.  Usefulness of Pretests for Estimating Underlying Technologies Using Dual Profit Functions , 1987 .

[18]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Imposing curvature restrictions on flexible functional forms , 1984 .

[19]  Robert D. Weaver Caveats on the Application of the Fourier Flexible Form: Discussion , 1984 .

[20]  Laurits R. Christensen,et al.  The translog function and the substitution of equipment, structures, and labor in U.S. manufacturing 1929-68 , 1973 .

[21]  William A. Barnett,et al.  New Indices of Money Supply and the Flexible Laurent Demand System , 1983 .

[22]  S. Ray A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture, 1939–77 , 1982 .

[23]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Testing the Assumptions of Production Theory: A Nonparametric Approach , 1972, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  R. Kopp,et al.  Testing for separable functional structure using temporary equilibrium models , 1986 .

[25]  M. Denny The Relationship Between Functional Forms for the Production System , 1974 .

[26]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  Global Properties of Flexible Functional Forms , 1980 .

[27]  Rulon D. Pope,et al.  Estimating Functional Forms with Special Reference to Agriculture: Discussion , 1984 .

[28]  M. Edward Rister,et al.  SELECTING FUNCTIONAL FORM IN PRODUCTION FUNCTION ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[29]  Walter Diewert,et al.  An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  A. Gallant,et al.  On the bias in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form : The fourier flexible form , 1981 .

[31]  Arnold Zellner,et al.  Generalized Production Functions , 1969 .

[32]  P. Samuelson Paul Douglas's Measurement of Production Functions and Marginal Productivities , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  Irving Hoch,et al.  Simultaneous Equation Bias in the Context of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function , 1958 .

[34]  M. Pesaran,et al.  TESTING NON-NESTED NONLINEAR REGRESSION MODELS , 1978 .

[35]  H. Varian The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis , 1982 .

[36]  R. Stone Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis : an application to the pattern of British demand , 1954 .

[37]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Relative Prices and Technical Change , 1983 .

[38]  H. Simon,et al.  On Parsimonious Explanations of Production Relations , 1979 .

[39]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THREE FLEXIBLE FUNCTIONAL FORMS , 1983 .

[40]  K. Hayes Third-Order Translog Utility Functions , 1986 .

[41]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Studies of a Class of Covariance Structure Models , 1973 .

[42]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  On the Flexibility of the Translog Approximation , 1980 .

[43]  C. Shumway Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops , 1983 .

[44]  William A. Barnett,et al.  The Muntz-Szatz demand system: An application of a globally well behaved series expansion , 1983 .

[45]  A. Deaton,et al.  Testing Linear versus Logarithmic Regression Models , 1980 .

[46]  I. Badawi An elasticity can be estimated consistently without a priori knowledge of functional form , 1983 .

[47]  A. Deaton Specification and Testing in Applied Demand Analysis , 1978 .