Risk communication in the case of the Fukushima accident: Impact of communication and lessons to be learned

Risk communication about the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident in 2011 was often not transparent, timely, clear, nor factually correct. However, lessons related to risk communication have been identified and some of them are already addressed in national and international communication programmes and strategies. The Fukushima accident may be seen as a practice scenario for risk communication with important lessons to be learned. As a result of risk communication failures during the accident, the world is now better prepared for communication related to nuclear emergencies than it was 5 years ago The present study discusses the impact of communication, as applied during the Fukushima accident, and the main lessons learned. It then identifies pathways for transparent, timely, clear and factually correct communication to be developed, practiced and applied in nuclear emergency communication before, during, and after nuclear accidents. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:683-686. © 2016 SETAC.

[1]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Acceptance of nuclear power: The Fukushima effect , 2013 .

[2]  W. Raskob,et al.  Improved communication, understanding of risk perception and ethics related to ionising radiation , 2016, Journal of Radiological Protection.

[3]  Philip Fei Wu,et al.  Community response grids: E-government, social networks, and effective emergency management , 2007 .

[4]  L. Dauer.  Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency , 2005 .

[5]  Saho Tateno,et al.  Public anxiety, trust, and the role of mediators in communicating risk of exposure to low dose radiation after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant explosion , 2013 .

[6]  P. Slovic.  The perception gap: Radiation and risk , 2012 .

[7]  Pablo M. Figueroa,et al.  Risk communication surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an anthropological approach , 2013 .

[8]  Looking for citizen-centered communication: dialogues between radiological protection or nuclear safety specialists and media professionals. , 2016, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[9]  Sean Bonner,et al.  Safecast: successful citizen-science for radiation measurement and communication after Fukushima , 2016, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[10]  D. Oughton,et al.  Units related to radiation exposure and radioactivity in mass media: the Fukushima case study in Europe and Russia. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[11]  D. Oughton,et al.  The limits of public communication coordination in a nuclear emergency: lessons from media reporting on the Fukushima case , 2016, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[12]  David R. Wrone.  The Zapruder Film: Reframing JFK's Assassination , 2003 .

[13]  K. Ng,et al.  The Fukushima Nuclear Crisis Reemphasizes the Need for Improved Risk Communication and Better Use of Social Media , 2012, Health physics.

[14]  D. Oughton,et al.  How did media present the radiation risks after the Fukushima accident: a content analysis of newspapers in Europe , 2016, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[15]  D. Oughton,et al.  Ethical challenges in social media engagement and research: considerations for code of engagement practices , 2016, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[16]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy , 2013 .

[17]  Sue Robinson,et al.  'If you had been with us': mainstream press and citizen journalists jockey for authority over the collective memory of Hurricane Katrina , 2009, New Media Soc..

[18]  Jill A. Edy,et al.  Reporting through the lens of the past , 2006 .

[19]  Joseph R. Dominick,et al.  Mass Media Research: An Introduction , 1983 .

[20]  Masashi Shirabe,et al.  From 'Risk Communication' to Participatory Radiation Risk Assessment , 2015 .

[21]  Tanja Perko,et al.  Information Sources as Explanatory Variables for the Belgian Health‐Related Risk Perception of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Christopher Edward Hobson.  Rebuilding Trust after Fukushima , 2015 .

[23]  T. Perko,et al.  Mass and New Media: Review of Framing, Treatment and Sources inReporting on Fukushima , 2015 .

[24]  T. Perko.  Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population. , 2014, Journal of environmental radioactivity.