Student Motivational Dynamics in the Era of School Reform

This article traces the conception of “the problem with the public school” as represented in 3 reform documents: A Nation at Risk (1983), the National Education Summit Policy Statement (1996), and the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). I examine the problem definitions and solutions manifested in each reform for beliefs about student motivation to learn. These beliefs in turn are compared to research illustrations of student motivation obtained in each reform period. The article ends with suggestions for “small changes” in classroom practices that might improve student motivation to learn, promote the goals of NCLB, and enhance the healthy development of children.

[1]  T. Good,et al.  Change and Continuity in Student Achievement from Grades 3 to 5: A Policy Dilemma , 2005 .

[2]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The Concept of Competence: A Starting Place for Understanding Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determined Extrinsic Motivation. , 2005 .

[3]  Mary M. Mccaslin.  The Problem of Problem Representation: The Summit's Conception of Student , 1996 .

[4]  J. Carroll.  A Model of School Learning , 1963, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[5]  P. Jackson.  Life in Classrooms , 1968 .

[6]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  Compliant Cognition: The Misalliance of Management and Instructional Goals in Current School Reform , 1992 .

[7]  Neville Bennett,et al.  TALKING AND LEARNING IN GROUPS , 1993 .

[8]  M. Covington.  Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform , 1992 .

[9]  E. Soloway,et al.  Learning With Peers: From Small Group Cooperation to Collaborative Communities , 1996 .

[10]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[11]  Catherine M. Mulryan.  Student Passivity During Cooperative Small Groups in Mathematics , 1992 .

[12]  David P. Gardner,et al.  A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[13]  Martin V. Covington,et al.  The Self-Worth Theory of Achievement Motivation: Findings and Implications , 1984, The Elementary School Journal.

[14]  T. Good,et al.  Listening in Classrooms , 1996 .

[15]  L. Corno,et al.  Success and Failure on Classroom Tasks: Adaptive Learning and Classroom Teaching , 1988, The Elementary School Journal.

[16]  T. Good,et al.  A Study of Comprehensive School Reform Programs in Arizona , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[17]  J. Dogin,et al.  Conflict in Child and Adolescent Development , 1996 .

[18]  Mary M. Rohrkemper,et al.  Elementary School Students' Reports of the Causes and Effects of Problem Difficulty in Mathematics , 1984, The Elementary School Journal.

[19]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: A Phenomenological View , 1989 .

[20]  Barbara Brown,et al.  Gender Composition and Small-Group Learning in Fourth-Grade Mathematics , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. , 1994 .

[22]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations , 2003 .

[23]  B. Bloom.  Human Characteristics and School Learning , 1979 .

[24]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Skee Smith,et al.  The U.S. Department of Education. , 1979 .

[26]  Leonard H. King.  High and Low Achievers' Perceptions and Cooperative Learning in Two Small Groups , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[27]  S. Nichols,et al.  Comprehensive School Reform: An Observational Study of Teaching in Grades 3 through 5 , 2006, The Elementary School Journal.