Using computational fluid dynamic and artificial neural networks to predict the performance and cavitation volume of a propeller under different geometrical and physical characteristics

ABSTRACT In the current study, simulations of hydrodynamic characteristics of a propeller under different geometrical and physical characteristics are conducted by the computational fluid dynamic (CFD). Then, by designing appropriate artificial neural networks (ANNs), the hydrodynamic performance and cavitation volume of propellers are predicted under intended conditions. For this accomplishment, finite volume-based Navier–Stokes equations associated with incompressible large eddy simulation turbulence model are used. In order to verify the computational procedure, mesh sensitivity analysis and validation study are conducted and appropriate accuracy is observed. In the CFD simulations, propeller thrust, torque and cavitation volume are computed under different pitch ratio (P/D), rake angle (RA) and skew angle (SA), advance velocity ratio (J) and cavitation number (σ). By the CFD results, a significant increase in propeller thrust and torque is observable by enhancement of P/D and positive value of RA. Moreover, maximum mean square errors of ANNs output in the prediction of propeller thrust, torque and cavitation volume achieved are 0.000111, 7.4206E−5 and 0.000667, respectively. Also, related to ANNs’ weights and bias, four set of equations are proposed to predict the performance and cavitation volume of propellers.

[1]  Numerical and Experimental Investigation into Propulsion and Cavitation Performance of Marine Propeller , 2013 .

[2]  Tobias Huuva,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics simulation of cavitating open propeller and azimuth thruster with nozzle in open water , 2016 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[4]  Manas Khurana,et al.  Application of swarm approach and aritficial neural networks for airfoil shape optimization , 2008 .

[5]  Kazuhiko Hasegawa,et al.  Automatic ship berthing using artificial neural network trained by consistent teaching data using nonlinear programming method , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[6]  J. Sauer,et al.  Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics , 2001 .

[7]  Chunlin Zhang,et al.  Intrusion detection using hierarchical neural networks , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[8]  Robert W. Kermeen Water tunnel tests of NACA 66_(1-012) hydrofoil in noncavitating and cavitating flows , 1956 .

[9]  Gerard Hamill,et al.  Determining propeller induced erosion alongside quay walls in harbours using Artificial Neural Networks , 2013 .

[10]  Lutz Prechelt,et al.  Early Stopping - But When? , 2012, Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade.

[11]  Nikolaos I Xiros,et al.  An integrated methodology for the optimal thermal design of an ocean turbine pressure vessel: A soft-computing approach , 2013 .

[12]  A. Khataee,et al.  Artificial neural networks modeling of contaminated water treatment processes by homogeneous and heterogeneous nanocatalysis , 2010 .

[13]  Lutz Prechelt,et al.  Automatic early stopping using cross validation: quantifying the criteria , 1998, Neural Networks.

[14]  J. D. van Manen,et al.  THE WAGENINGEN B-SCREW SERIES , 1969 .

[15]  Giovanni Bernardini,et al.  Automated Marine Propeller Design Combining Hydrodynamics Models and Neural Networks , 2010 .

[16]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Forecasting: Methods and Applications, 3rd Ed , 1997 .

[17]  Zhiguo Zhang,et al.  Application of Dynamic Mesh in Analysis of Propeller Hydrodynamic Characteristics , 2012 .

[18]  NaiXian Lu Numerical Simulations of the Cavitating Flow on a Marine Propeller , 2012 .

[19]  G. Iaccarino,et al.  Wall modeling for large-eddy simulation using an immersed boundary method , 2022 .

[20]  Yulin Wu,et al.  Unsteady cavitation characteristics and alleviation of pressure fluctuations around marine propellers with different skew angles , 2014 .

[21]  Yen-Ming Chiang,et al.  Comparison of static-feedforward and dynamic-feedback neural networks for rainfall -runoff modeling , 2004 .

[22]  Milton S. Boyd,et al.  Designing a neural network for forecasting financial and economic time series , 1996, Neurocomputing.

[23]  Antonello Pasini,et al.  Artificial neural networks for small dataset analysis. , 2015, Journal of thoracic disease.

[24]  Luca Greco,et al.  Computational analysis of marine propeller performance and cavitation by using an inviscid-flow BEM model , 2011 .

[25]  Roham Bakhtyar,et al.  Application of neuro-fuzzy approach in prediction of runup in swash zone , 2008 .

[26]  Deok-Hwan Kim,et al.  Solving local minima problem with large number of hidden nodes on two-layered feed-forward artificial neural networks , 2008, Neurocomputing.

[27]  Stephan Trenn,et al.  Multilayer Perceptrons: Approximation Order and Necessary Number of Hidden Units , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[28]  Yixian Yang,et al.  Bounds on the number of hidden neurons in three-layer binary neural networks , 2003, Neural Networks.

[29]  Shosaburo Yamasaki,et al.  Numerical Study on Cavitation Erosion Risk of Marine Propellers Operating in Wake Flow , 2011 .

[30]  J. van Leeuwen,et al.  Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[31]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection , 1991 .

[32]  Lars Larsson,et al.  Numerical optimisation of propeller-hull configurations at full scale , 2006 .

[33]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[34]  G. David Garson,et al.  Interpreting neural-network connection weights , 1991 .

[35]  H. Ghasemi,et al.  THE EFFECT OF WAKE FLOW AND SKEW ANGLE ON THE SHIP PROPELLER PERFORMANCE , 2009 .

[36]  R. Bensow,et al.  Implicit LES Predictions of the Cavitating Flow on a Propeller , 2010 .

[37]  Hongxuan Peng,et al.  Effect of turbulence models on RANS computation of propeller vortex flow , 2013 .

[38]  Mehrzad Shams,et al.  A study on the effect of the rake angle on the performance of marine propellers , 2012 .

[39]  Fred L. Collopy,et al.  Error Measures for Generalizing About Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons , 1992 .

[40]  Dong Geun Baek,et al.  Effects of the advance ratio on the evolution of a propeller wake , 2015 .

[41]  L. Pazvakawambwa,et al.  Forecasting methods and applications. , 2013 .