Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rule

In this paper we propose five versions of a Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule (PCR) for information fusion together with several examples. From PCR1 to PCR2, PCR3, PCR4, PCR5 one increases the complexity of the rules and also the exactitude of the redistribution of conflicting masses. PCR1 restricted from the hyper-power set to the power set and without degenerate cases gives the same result as the Weighted Average Operator (WAO) proposed recently by J{\o}sang, Daniel and Vannoorenberghe but does not satisfy the neutrality property of vacuous belief assignment. That's why improved PCR rules are proposed in this paper. PCR4 is an improvement of minC and Dempster's rules. The PCR rules redistribute the conflicting mass, after the conjunctive rule has been applied, proportionally with some functions depending on the masses assigned to their corresponding columns in the mass matrix. There are infinitely many ways these functions (weighting factors) can be chosen depending on the complexity one wants to deal with in specific applications and fusion systems. Any fusion combination rule is at some degree ad-hoc.

[1]  D. Dubois,et al.  On the Combination of Evidence in Various Mathematical Frameworks , 1992 .

[2]  R. Yager.  On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules , 1987, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Ronald R. Yager.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF METHODS OF AGGREGATING EVIDENCE IN EXPERT SYSTEMS , 1985 .

[4]  Eric Lefevre,et al.  Belief function combination and conflict management , 2002, Inf. Fusion.

[5]  Milan Daniel,et al.  Associativity in combination of belief functions; a derivation of minC combination , 2003, Soft Comput..

[6]  Henri Prade,et al.  Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  On the Validity of Dempster''s Rule of Combination of Evidence , 1979 .

[8]  Frans Voorbraak,et al.  On the Justification of Dempster's Rule of Combination , 1988, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  J. Dezert,et al.  Performance evaluation of fusion rules for multitarget tracking in clutter based on generalized data association , 2005, 2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[11]  R. Yager.  Hedging in the Combination of Evidence , 1983 .

[12]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Belief functions: The disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem , 1993, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[13]  Kari Sentz,et al.  Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2002 .

[14]  Jean Dezert,et al.  Applications and Advances of DSmT for Information Fusion , 2004 .

[15]  Toshiyuki Inagaki.  Interdependence between safety-control policy and multiple-sensor schemes via Dempster-Shafer theory , 1991 .

[16]  Milan Daniel.  Distribution of Contradictive Belief Masses in Combination of Belief Functions , 2000 .

[17]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A Simple View of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence and Its Implication for the Rule of Combination , 1985, AI Mag..

[18]  Catherine K. Murphy.  Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  P. Smets.  Data fusion in the transferable belief model , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[20]  P. Vannoorenberghe,et al.  Strategies for combining conflicting dogmatic beliefs , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[21]  Jean Dezert,et al.  A Simple Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rule , 2004, cs/0408010.

[22]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Review of A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 1984 .

[23]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[24]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.