Who cares about the double helix?

Collective memory links the past to the future in science as well as history.

[1]  Robert Olby,et al.  Quiet debut for the double helix , 2003, Nature.

[2]  F. Collins,et al.  New goals for the U.S. Human Genome Project: 1998-2003. , 1998, Science.

[3]  Leslie Roberts,et al.  Controversial From the Start , 2001, Science.

[4]  P. Abir-Am,et al.  Commemorative practices in science : historical perspectives on the politics of collective memory , 1999 .

[5]  D. Miska.  Biotech's twentieth birthday blues , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[6]  T. Harris.  Genetics, genomics and beyond. , 2001, Trends in molecular medicine.

[7]  Edward J. Wood,et al.  Biochemistry and molecular biology teaching over the past 50 years , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  Michel Morange.  A history of molecular biology , 1998 .

[9]  B. Strasser.  Linus Pauling's "molecular diseases": between history and memory. , 2002, American journal of medical genetics.

[10]  E Marshall,et al.  A History of the Human Genome Project , 2001, Science.

[11]  Suzanne Anker,et al.  The Molecular Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age , 2003 .

[12]  F. Crick,et al.  Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid , 1953, Nature.

[13]  M. Kemp.  The Mona Lisa of modern science , 2003, Nature.

[14]  P. Abir-Am.  Themes, Genres and Orders of Legitimation in the Consolidation of New Scientific Disciplines: Deconstructing the Historiography of Molecular Biology , 1985, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.