Realistic motor unit placement in a cylindrical HD-sEMG generation model

The aim of this work is to assess an automatic optimized algorithm for the positioning of the Motor Units (MUs) within a multilayered cylindrical High Density surface EMG (HD-sEMG) generation model representing a skeletal muscle. The multilayered cylinder is composed of three layers: muscle, adipose and skin tissues. For this purpose, two different algorithms will be compared: an unconstrained random and a Mitchell's Best Candidate (MBC) placements, both with uniform distribution for the MUs positions. These algorithms will then be compared by their fiber density within the muscle and by using a classical amplitude descriptor, the Root-Mean-Square (RMS) amplitude value obtained from 64 HD-sEMG signals recorded by an 8×8 electrode grid of circular electrode during one contraction at 70% Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) in both simulation and experimental conditions for the Biceps Brachii (BB) muscle. The obtained results clearly exposed the necessity to use a specific algorithm to place the MUs within the muscle representation volume in agreement with physiology.

[1]  S Boudaoud,et al.  On the benefits of using HD-sEMG technique for estimating muscle force , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[2]  Mahmoud Hassan,et al.  Denoising of HD-sEMG signals using canonical correlation analysis , 2017, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  R. Enoka,et al.  Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  Don P. Mitchell,et al.  Generating antialiased images at low sampling densities , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Sofiane Boudaoud,et al.  Fast generation model of high density surface EMG signals in a cylindrical conductor volume , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  E Stålberg,et al.  Scanning EMG in normal muscle and in neuromuscular disorders. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.