The effect of migration on the spatial structure of intraguild predation in metapopulations

We consider the effects of migration on intraguild predation (IGP) via lattice models and pair approximation. The following results can be found: there exists asymmetry between two consumers’ migration effects on the spatial structure of IGP; migration of each consumer reduces its own clumping degree; the spatial structure is influenced by the ecological neighborhood.

[1]  R D Holt,et al.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  A. D. de Roos,et al.  Impact of Intraguild Predation and Stage Structure on Simple Communities along a Productivity Gradient , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[3]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[5]  Kei-ichi Tainaka,et al.  Asymmetrical effect of migration on a prey–predator model , 2006 .

[6]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Population persistence and spatially limited social interaction. , 1995, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  Kei-ichi Tainaka.  Intrinsic Uncertainty in Ecological Catastrophe , 1994 .

[8]  Tomás A. Revilla,et al.  Effects of intraguild predation on resource competition. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  C. Hui,et al.  Spatial Patterns of Prisoner’s Dilemma Game in Metapopulations , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[10]  C. Hui,et al.  Dynamical complexity and metapopulation persistence , 2003 .

[11]  Kei-ichi Tainaka,et al.  Paradoxical effect in a three-candidate voter model , 1993 .

[12]  Y. Takeuchi,et al.  The Effect of Mutualism on Community Stability , 2003 .

[13]  T. Okuyama.  Intraguild predation with spatially structured interactions , 2008 .

[14]  Cang Hui,et al.  A spatially explicit approach to estimating species occupancy and spatial correlation. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[15]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population: The Lattice Lotka-Volterra Model , 1992 .

[16]  Priyanga Amarasekare,et al.  Productivity, dispersal and the coexistence of intraguild predators and prey. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  R. Law,et al.  Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors , 2002 .

[18]  W. Wilson,et al.  Spatial Instabilities within the Diffusive Lotka-Volterra System: Individual-Based Simulation Results , 1993 .

[19]  Kei-ichi Tainaka,et al.  Spatial Pattern in a Chemical Reaction System: Prey and Predator in the Position-Fixed Limit , 1992 .

[20]  Norio Konno,et al.  Upper bounds for survival probability of the contact process , 1991 .

[21]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Pair Approximations for Lattice-based Ecological Models , 2000 .

[22]  J. Szwabiński,et al.  Effects of random habitat destruction in a predator–prey model , 2006 .