Legitimating Agencies in the Face of Selection: The Case of AACSB

This article proposes that legitimating agencies such as accreditation organizations face selection pressures to both maintain their legitimacy among their constituents, but also to expand the domain of their activities. We argue that domain expansion raises three important research questions: first, the factors that lead legitimating agencies to expand their domain; second, the need to maintain legitimacy among existing constituents; and third, the establishment of legitimacy in the new domain. We use the domain expansion of the AACSB to develop propositions relevant to these three research issues. Quality concerns, process vs. content strategy, and institutional entrepreneurship are the main factors that impact the legitimation of legitimating agencies.

[1]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[2]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[3]  W. Scott.  The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[4]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Jens Beckert.  Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations , 1999 .

[6]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[7]  E. Romanelli,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[8]  Gerald Zeitz,et al.  Distinguishing Adoption and Entrenchment of Management Practices: A Framework for Analysis , 1999 .

[9]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[10]  Joni J. Young.  Outlining regulatory space: Agenda issues and the FASB , 1994 .

[11]  Philip Selznick.  TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[12]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[13]  J. Barney.  The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[14]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  A diametric forces model of strategic change: Assessing the antecedents and consequences of restructuring in the higher education industry , 1993 .

[15]  K. Provan,et al.  Legitimacy Building in the Evolution of Small-Firm Multilateral Networks: A Comparative Study of Success and Demise , 2000 .

[16]  L. Porter,et al.  Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? , 1988 .

[17]  W. Scott,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments , 1998 .

[18]  The Emergence of a European Regulatory Field of Management Education – Standardizing Through Accreditation, Ranking and Guidelines , 2001 .

[19]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings , 1996 .

[20]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[21]  H. Rao,et al.  Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[24]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: a study of drug abuse treatment units. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[25]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[26]  Alison Davis-Blake,et al.  When Accreditation Standards Change: Factors Affecting Differential Responsiveness of Public and Private Organizations , 2002 .

[27]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[28]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[29]  E. Litwak,et al.  Interorganizational Analysis: A Hypothesis on Co-ordinating Agencies , 1962 .

[30]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking during Strategic Change in Academia. , 1996 .

[31]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[32]  Rodolphe Durand,et al.  Firm Selection: An Integrative Perspective , 2001 .

[33]  Petter Holm.  The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Processes in Norwegian Fisheries , 1995 .

[34]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[35]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[36]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: a study of drug abuse treatment units. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[37]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[38]  Andrew D. Henderson,et al.  Selection-Based Learning: The Coevolution of Internal and External Selection in High-Velocity Environments , 2004 .

[39]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Does Isomorphism Legitimate? , 1996 .

[40]  M. Dacin,et al.  Isomorphism In Context: The Power And Prescription Of Institutional Norms , 1997 .

[41]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[42]  A. Raveh,et al.  Conceptual maps of the leading MBA programs in the United States: core courses, concentration areas, and the ranking of the school , 1999 .

[43]  Stephen J. Mezias,et al.  Resolving Financial Reporting Problems: An Institutional Analysis of the Process , 1994 .

[44]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[45]  Joel Podolny,et al.  Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry , 1999 .

[46]  S. Mezias.  An Institutional Model of Organizational Practice: Financial Reporting at the Fortune 200 , 1990 .

[47]  Robert N. Stern.  Competitive Influences on the Interorganizational Regulation of College Athletics , 1981 .

[48]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[49]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[50]  Barbara Townley,et al.  The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change , 2002 .