A behavioral modeling approach to bicycle level of service

Abstract Bicycle level of service (LOS) measures are essential tools for transportation agencies to monitor and prioritize improvements to infrastructure for cyclists. While it is apparent that different types of cyclists have varying preferences for the facilities on which they ride, in current research and practice, measures are used that are either insufficiently quantitative and empirical or lack cyclist segmentation. In this study, we conducted a detailed survey on cyclist habits, preferences, and user experience, capturing responses to videos of a bicycle traveling on road segments in the San Francisco Bay Area. The survey provided rich behavioral data, which invited both quantitative and qualitative exploration. We compared facility preferences from the survey to scores from two common measures, NCHRP bicycle level of service (NCHRP BLOS), and level of traffic stress (LTS); and we examined the responses to open-ended questions to gain insights about heterogeneity of preferences among cyclists. Finally, we applied behavioral analysis tools as a proof of concept for a new bicycle level of service measure that accounts for the segmentation of cyclist types via a latent class choice model. Combining statistics and behavioral analysis, we can improve the quality of bicycle level of service measures to make decisions driven by empirically measured cyclist preferences.

[1]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[2]  K. Krizek,et al.  Gender Differences in Bicycling Behavior and Facility Preferences , 2005 .

[3]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The accessibility of railway stations: the role of the bicycle in The Netherlands , 2000 .

[4]  Thomas Walsh,et al.  BICYCLE STRESS LEVEL AS A TOOL TO EVALUATE URBAN AND SUBURBAN BICYCLE COMPATIBILITY , 1994 .

[5]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions , 2007, J. Geogr. Syst..

[6]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An Endogenous Segmentation Mode Choice Model with an Application to Intercity Travel , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[7]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  A hybrid-choice latent-class model for the analysis of the effects of weather on cycling demand , 2015 .

[8]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Joint Model of Choice of Residential Neighborhood and Bicycle Ownership , 2008 .

[9]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[10]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets , 2008 .

[11]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[12]  K. Teschke,et al.  Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride , 2011 .

[13]  John Forester.  Bicycle Transportation: A Handbook for Cycling Transportation Engineers , 1983 .

[14]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective , 2005 .

[15]  V. E. Daniel,et al.  Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? , 2004 .

[16]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand , 2007 .