Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support?

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze a large group of CT and MRI examinations for appropriateness using evidence-based guidelines. METHODS The authors reviewed medical records from 459 elective outpatient CT and MR examinations from primary care physicians. Evidence-based appropriateness criteria from a radiology benefit management company were used to determine if the examination would have met criteria for approval. Submitted clinical history at the time of interpretation and clinic notes and laboratory results preceding the date of the imaging study were examined to simulate a real-time consultation with the referring provider. The radiology reports and subsequent clinic visits were analyzed for outcomes. RESULTS Of the 459 examinations reviewed, 284 (62%) were CT and 175 (38%) were MRI. Three hundred forty-one (74%) were considered appropriate, and 118 (26%) were not considered appropriate. Examples of inappropriate examinations included brain CT for chronic headache, lumbar spine MR for acute back pain, knee or shoulder MRI in patients with osteoarthritis, and CT for hematuria during a urinary tract infection. Fifty-eight percent of the appropriate studies had positive results and affected subsequent management, whereas only thirteen percent [corrected] of inappropriate studies had positive results and affected management. CONCLUSION A high percentage of examinations not meeting appropriateness criteria and subsequently yielding negative results suggests a need for tools to help primary care physicians improve the quality of their imaging decision requests. In the current environment, which stresses cost containment and comparative effectiveness, traditional radiology benefit management tools are being challenged by clinical decision support, with an emphasis on provider education coupled with electronic order entry systems.

[1]  C E Kahn,et al.  Applicability of American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria in a general internal medicine clinic. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  L. Manchikanti,et al.  Re: Chou R, Loeser JD,Owens DK, et al. Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine 2009; 34:1066–77. , 2010, Spine.

[3]  J. Amorosa,et al.  Do clinicians use the American College of Radiology Appropriateness criteria in the management of their patients? , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  James H Thrall,et al.  Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. , 2009, Radiology.

[5]  Hoangmai H Pham,et al.  Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[7]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. , 1994, Lancet.

[8]  James H Thrall.  Reinventing radiology in the digital age. Part II. New directions and new stakeholder value. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  James H Thrall,et al.  Application of Recently Developed Computer Algorithm for Automatic Classification of Unstructured Radiology Reports: Validation Study 1 , 2004 .

[10]  James H Thrall,et al.  Reinventing radiology in the digital age: part I. The all-digital department. , 2005, Radiology.

[11]  E. Kazerooni,et al.  Effect of mandatory radiology consultation on inpatient imaging use. A randomized controlled trial. , 1996, JAMA.

[12]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Interventional Therapies, Surgery, and Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Low Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society , 2009, Spine.

[13]  Ronald L Arenson,et al.  The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[14]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. , 2008, Health affairs.

[15]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  L. Tanoue.  Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[17]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  J. Iglehart.  Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Lei Feng,et al.  Online radiology appropriateness survey: results and conclusions from an academic internal medicine residency. , 2003, Academic radiology.