Improving care near the end of life. Why is it so hard?

A 56-year-old smoker with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease develops pneumonia and respiratory failure and is placed on mechanical ventilation. He dies 2 weeks later, after a stormy intensive care unit (ICU) course complicated by gastrointestinal bleeding and septic shock. The next morning, the ICU team questions how such a series of events occurred. Although each intervention could be justified as a response to a treatable complication, did the team truly consider the patient's overall prognosis or determine whether he really wanted such aggressive care? See also p 1591. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT) intervention described in this issue ofThe Journalattempted to prevent such high-technology deaths.1The SUPPORT investigators are to be congratulated on a rigorous, complex project. Yet, despite their best efforts in this multicenter randomized clinical trial, the intervention failed to improve any of the study outcomes.

[1]  M. Angell The case of Helga Wanglie. A new kind of "right to die" case. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  L. I. Southerland,et al.  A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  E. Calkins,et al.  Enhancing physician adoption of practice guidelines. Dissemination of influenza vaccination guideline using a small-group consensus process. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  D. Meier,et al.  Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  S. Clark,et al.  Universal hepatitis B immunization of infants: reactions of pediatricians and family physicians over time. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[6]  William A. Knaus,et al.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. , 1995, JAMA.

[7]  T. Raffin,et al.  Initiating and Withdrawing Life Support , 1988 .

[8]  Eugene Vayda,et al.  Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. , 1991, JAMA.

[9]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Changing physicians' practices. , 1993, Tobacco control.

[10]  B. Lo Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians , 1995 .

[11]  S Tenner,et al.  The influence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  S. Miles Informed demand for "non-beneficial" medical treatment. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  L. Goldman,et al.  Impact of inter-physician communication on the effectiveness of medical consultations. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Cleeland,et al.  Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  L. Goldman,et al.  The SUPPORT Prognostic Model: Objective Estimates of Survival for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Total quality management and physicians' clinical decisions. , 1993, JAMA.