Motion and rigidity of the Pacific Plate and implications for plate boundary deformation

[1] Using up to 11 years of data from a global network of Global Positioning System (GPS) stations, including 12 stations well distributed across the Pacific Plate, we derive present-day Euler vectors for the Pacific Plate more precisely than has previously been possible from space geodetic data. After rejecting on statistical grounds the velocity of one station on each of the Pacific and North American plates, we find that the quality of fit of the horizontal velocities of 11 Pacific Plate (PA) stations to the best fitting PA Euler vector is similar to the fit of 11 Australian Plate (AU) velocities to the AU Euler vector and � 20% better than the fit of nine North American Plate (NA) velocities to the NA Euler vector. The velocities of stations on the Pacific and Australian Plates each fit a rigid plate model with an RMS residual of 0.4 mm/yr, while the North American velocities fit a rigid plate model with an RMS velocity of 0.6 mm/yr. Our best fitting PA/AU relative Euler vector is located � 170 km southeast of the NUVEL-1A pole but is not significantly different at the 95% confidence level. It is also close (<70 km in position and <3% in rate) to a pole derived from transform faults identified from satellite altimetry, suggesting that the vector has not changed significantly over the past 3 Myr. Our relative Euler vector is also consistent with all known geological and geodetic evidence concerning the AU/PA plate boundary through New Zealand. The GPS sites offshore of southern California are presently moving 4–5 ± 1 mm/yr relative to predicted Pacific velocity, with their residual velocities in approximately the opposite direction to PA/NA relative motion. Likewise, the easternmost sites in South Island, New Zealand, are moving � 3 ± 1 mm/yr relative to predicted Pacific velocity, with the residuals in approximately the opposite direction to PA/AU relative motion. These velocity residuals are in the same sense as predicted by elastic strain accumulation on known plate boundary faults but are of a significantly higher magnitude in both southern California and New Zealand, implying that the plate boundary zones in both regions are wider than previously believed. INDEX TERMS: 1206 Geodesy and Gravity: Crustal movements—interplate (8155); 1208 Geodesy and Gravity: Crustal movements—intraplate (8110); 1243 Geodesy and Gravity: Space geodetic surveys; 8158 Tectonophysics: Evolution of the Earth: Plate motions—present and recent (3040); 8159 Tectonophysics: Evolution of the Earth: Rheology—crust and lithosphere; KEYWORDS: Pacific plate motion, plate rigidity, plate boundary deformation

[1]  D. Kuang,et al.  Geodetic measurements of convergence at the New Hebrides island arc indicate arc fragmentation caused by an impinging aseismic ridge , 1995 .

[2]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications , 2002 .

[3]  Geodetic estimates of fault slip rates in the San Francisco Bay area , 1999 .

[4]  J. Wahr,et al.  Geodetic measurements in Greenland and their implications , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Global Plate Velocities from the Global Positioning System , 1997 .

[6]  T. Dixon,et al.  Noise in GPS coordinate time series , 1999 .

[7]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Southern California permanent GPS geodetic array: Error analysis of daily position estimates and site velocities , 1997 .

[8]  W. Peltier,et al.  Ice Age Paleotopography , 1994, Science.

[9]  P. Knuepfer.  Temporal variations in latest Quaternary slip across the Australian-Pacific Plate Boundary, northeastern South Island, New Zealand , 1992 .

[10]  C. Demets,et al.  Constraints on present-day plate motions south of 30°S from satellite altimetry , 1996 .

[11]  Robert W. King,et al.  Estimating regional deformation from a combination of space and terrestrial geodetic data , 1998 .

[12]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Southern California permanent GPS geodetic array: Spatial filtering of daily positions for estimating coseismic and postseismic displacements induced by the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1997 .

[13]  Mariana Trench,et al.  Plate kinematics in the western Pacific derived from geodetic observations , 2002 .

[14]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions , 1994 .

[15]  S. Cande,et al.  Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic , 1995 .

[16]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Gravitational viscoelastic postseismic relaxation on a layered spherical Earth , 1997 .

[17]  T. Dixon,et al.  New kinematic models for Pacific‐North America motion from 3 Ma to present, I: Evidence for steady motion and biases in the NUVEL‐1A Model , 1999 .

[18]  Thomas A. Clark,et al.  Measurement of horizontal motions in Alaska using very long baseline interferometry , 1990 .

[19]  P. England,et al.  Crustal deformation during 1994-1998 due to oblique continental collision in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand, and implications for seismic potential of the Alpine fault , 1999 .

[20]  John Haines,et al.  Contemporary horizontal velocity and strain rate fields of the Pacific‐Australian plate boundary zone through New Zealand , 2001 .

[21]  P. Tregoning.  Is the Australian Plate deforming? A space geodetic perspective , 2003 .

[22]  William Rodi,et al.  Global Positioning System constraints on fault slip rates in southern California and northern Baja, Mexico , 1996 .

[23]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  The 23 May 1989 MacQuarie Ridge Earthquake: A very broad band analysis , 1990 .

[24]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Modal depth anomalies from multibeam bathymetry: Is there a South Pacific superswell? , 1996 .

[25]  J. Stock,et al.  Pacific-North America Plate Tectonics of the Neogene Southwestern United States: An Update , 1998 .

[26]  T. Dixon,et al.  New kinematic models for Pacific‐North America Motion from 3 Ma to Present, II: Evidence for a “Baja California Shear Zone” , 2000 .

[27]  J. Beavan,et al.  Evidence from GPS measurements for contemporary interplate coupling on the southern Hikurangi subduction thrust and for partitioning of strain in the upper plate , 2001 .

[28]  Kurt L. Feigl,et al.  Space geodetic measurement of crustal deformation in central and southern California , 1993 .

[29]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[30]  L. Ruff,et al.  Fault parameters and tsunami excitation of the May 13, 1993, Shumagin Islands earthquake , 1994 .

[31]  N. Litchfield,et al.  Holocene motion on the Akatore Fault, south Otago coast, New Zealand , 2000 .

[32]  R. Walcott.  Modes of oblique compression: Late Cenozoic tectonics of the south island of New Zealand , 1998 .

[33]  P. England,et al.  Crustal deformation of the Marlborough Fault Zone in the South Island of New Zealand: Geodetic constraints over the interval 1982–1994 , 1998 .

[34]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[35]  J. Stock,et al.  Geophysics of the Pitman Fracture Zone and Pacific-Antarctic Plate Motions During the Cenozoic , 1995, Science.

[36]  J. Braun,et al.  The tectonic evolution of the Southern Alps, New Zealand: insights from fully thermally coupled dynamical modelling , 1999 .

[37]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Viscoelastic coupling model of the San Andreas Fault along the Big Bend, southern California , 1998 .

[38]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  No-net-rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL-1 , 1991 .

[39]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Estimation of current plate motions in Papua New Guinea from Global Positioning System observations , 1998 .

[40]  O. Kamigaichi,et al.  Initial results from WING, the continuous GPS network in the western Pacific area , 1998 .

[41]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Kinematics of the Pacific-North America plate boundary zone , 1999 .

[42]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California , 1973 .

[43]  P. Denys,et al.  Geodetic constraints on the kinematics of the Alpine Fault in the southern South Island of New Zealand, using results from the Hawea‐Haast GPS Transect , 2000 .

[44]  Wen-yao Zhu,et al.  Global plate motion models incorporating the velocity field of ITRF96 , 1999 .

[45]  John Langbein,et al.  Correlated errors in geodetic time series: Implications for time‐dependent deformation , 1997 .

[46]  Arthur L. Lerner-Lam,et al.  Geodetic constraints on the rigidity and relative motion of Eurasia and North America , 2000 .

[47]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus , 2000 .

[48]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Fault parameters and tsunami excitation of the May 23, 1989, MacQuarie Ridge Earthquake , 1990 .

[49]  S. Stein,et al.  How rigid is the stable interior of the North American Plate , 1996 .

[50]  Brian Taylor,et al.  Geodetic observations of very rapid convergence and back-arc extension at the Tonga arc , 1995, Nature.