The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect that different head conductor models have on the source estimation accuracy of magnetoencephalography (MEG) under realistic conditions. METHODS Magnetic fields evoked by current dipoles were simulated using a highly refined 3-layer realistically shaped conductor model. Noise from a real MEG measurement was added to the simulated fields. Source parameters (location, strength, orientation) were estimated from the noisy signals using 3 spherically symmetric models and several one- and 3-layer realistically shaped boundary-element models. The effect of different measurement sensors (gradiometers, magnetometers) was also tested. RESULTS The noise typically present in brain signals masked the errors due to the different conductor models so that in most situations the models gave comparable results. Active cortical areas around the vertex and in the temporal, frontoparietal, and occipital regions were typically found with 2-4 mm accuracy, whereas source localization in several anterior frontal lobe and deep brain structures yielded errors exceeding 2 cm. Localization in anterior frontal regions may benefit most from the use of realistically shaped models. CONCLUSIONS The traditionally used sphere model is an adequate model for most research purposes. Any means that increase the signal-to-noise ratio are of highest importance in attempting to improve the source estimation accuracy.

[1]  Rik Van de Walle,et al.  Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  D. Cohen,et al.  Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Brebbia,et al.  Boundary Element Techniques , 1984 .

[4]  J Haueisen,et al.  The influence of local tissue conductivity changes on the magnetoencephalogram and the electroencephalogram. , 2000, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[5]  M. Fuchs,et al.  Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  O Salonen,et al.  Three‐dimensional integration of brain anatomy and function to facilitate intraoperative navigation around the sensorimotor strip , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[7]  M. Fuchs,et al.  An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[9]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC , 1997, Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136).

[10]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom , 1998, NeuroImage.

[12]  B. Lutkenhoner,et al.  Localization of a dipolar source in a skull phantom: realistic versus spherical model , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  J. Pernier,et al.  A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Lynn,et al.  The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology. II. Numerical solution of the integral equations. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[15]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Magnetoencephalographic Localization of Subdural Dipoles in a Patient with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy , 1991, Epilepsia.

[17]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  Current Distribution in the Brain From Surface Electrodes , 1968, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  C. Laymon.  A. study , 2018, Predication and Ontology.

[19]  B. Yvert,et al.  An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC , 1997 .

[21]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Visualization of Magnetoencephalographic Data Using Minimum Current Estimates , 1999, NeuroImage.

[22]  Kenji Shibata,et al.  Influence of head model in biomagnetic source localization , 2005, Brain Topography.

[23]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[24]  K. Uutela,et al.  Detecting and Correcting for Head Movements in Neuromagnetic Measurements , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  B.N. Cuffin,et al.  EEG localization accuracy improvements using realistically shaped head models , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  S. Sato,et al.  Localization of implanted dipoles by magnetoencephalography , 1991, Neurology.

[28]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[30]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[31]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[32]  David Poeppel,et al.  Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  M Wagner,et al.  Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.