The evaluation of uncertainty in mass calibration: possible approaches in a comparison study
暂无分享,去创建一个
In this paper we give the results of four methods of calculating uncertainty associated with a mass calibration problem, three based on different implementations – the first and second order law of propagation of uncertainty and the Monte Carlo method – of the general methodology described by the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, the fourth based on a Bayesian formulation. The nonlinearities present in the model for the calibration problem means that the first order approach can be an unreliable method for evaluating uncertainties, relative to the other three approaches.
[1] A. Forbes. An MCMC algorithm based on GUM Supplement 1 for uncertainty evaluation , 2012 .
[2] Alistair B. Forbes,et al. The GUM, Bayesian inference and the observation and measurement equations. , 2011 .
[3] Clemens Elster,et al. Draft GUM Supplement 1 and Bayesian analysis , 2007 .
[4] C. Elster. Calculation of uncertainty in the presence of prior knowledge , 2007 .
[5] Alistair B. Forbes,et al. Approaches to evaluating measurement uncertainty , 2012 .