Improved modeling of gross primary production from a better representation of photosynthetic components in vegetation canopy

Non-photosynthetic components within the canopy (e.g., dry leaves and stem) contribute little to photosynthesis and therefore, remote sensing of gross primary production (GPP) could be improved by the removal of these components. A scaled enhanced vegetation index (EVI), which is usually regarded as a linear function of EVI, was found to have the strongest relationship with chlorophyll level fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPARchl) and can help improve GPP estimation in croplands compared to canopy level FPAR (FPARcanopy). However, the application of the FPARchl theory to other plant functional types (PFTs) and the underlying reasons remain largely unknown. In this study, based on standard MODIS algorithm we comprehensively assessed the performances of FPARcanopy, scaled EVI (FPARchl1), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), scaled NDVI (FPARchl2) and EVI as proxies of FPAR for estimating GPP at four forest and six non-forest sites (e.g., grasslands, croplands and wetlands) from ChinaFLUX, representing a wide range of ecosystems with different canopy structures and eco-climatic zones. Our results showed that the scaled EVI (FPARchl1) as FPAR effectively improved the accuracy of estimated GPP for the entire PFTs. FPARchl1 substantially improved forest GPP estimations with higher coefficient of determination (R2), lower root mean square error (RMSE) and lower bias. In comparison, for non-forest PFTs, the improvement in R2 between estimated GPP based on FPARchl1 (GPPchl1) and flux tower GPP was less evident than those between flux GPP and GPP estimations from FPARcanopy (GPPcanopy), FPARchl2, NDVI and EVI. The temperature and water attenuation scalars played important roles in reducing the difference of various GPP and indirectly reducing the impact of different FPARs on GPP in non-forest PFTs. Even so, FPARchl1 is an ecologically more meaningful parameter since FPARchl1 and flux tower GPP dropped to zero more synchronously in both forest and non-forest sites. In particular, we found that the improvement of GPPchl1 relative to GPPcanopy was positively correlated with the maximum leaf area index (LAI), implying the importance of site characteristic in regulating the strength of the improvement. This is encouraging for remote sensing of GPP for which vegetation parameter retrieval has often been found to be less successful at high LAI due to saturations in reflective and scattering domains. Our results demonstrate the significance of accurate and ecologically meaningful FPAR parameterization for improving our current capability in GPP modeling.

[1]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS gross primary productivity for Africa using eddy covariance data , 2013 .

[2]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Modeling gross primary production of temperate deciduous broadleaf forest using satellite images and climate data , 2004 .

[3]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Depression of net ecosystem CO2 exchange in semi-arid Leymus chinensis steppe and alpine shrub , 2006 .

[4]  Yujie Wang,et al.  Impacts of light use efficiency and fPAR parameterization on gross primary production modeling , 2014 .

[5]  Dan Liu,et al.  Global comparison of light use efficiency models for simulating terrestrial vegetation gross primary production based on the LaThuile database , 2014 .

[6]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Relating seasonal patterns of the AVHRR vegetation index to simulated photosynthesis and transpiration of forests in different climates , 1988 .

[7]  Jiyuan Liu,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s , 2014, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[8]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[9]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009 , 2010, Science.

[10]  Lunche Wang,et al.  Comparison of Different GPP Models in China Using MODIS Image and ChinaFLUX Data , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Bo-Cai Gao,et al.  Using EO-1 Hyperion to Simulate HyspIRI Products for a Coniferous Forest: The Fraction of PAR Absorbed by Chlorophyll $(\hbox{fAPAR}_{\rm chl})$ and Leaf Water Content (LWC) , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Estimation of crop gross primary production (GPP): I. impact of MODIS observation footprint and impact of vegetation BRDF characteristics , 2014 .

[13]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Uncertainty in simulating gross primary production of cropland ecosystem from satellite-based models , 2015 .

[14]  C. Tucker,et al.  North American vegetation patterns observed with the NOAA-7 advanced very high resolution radiometer , 1985, Vegetatio.

[15]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Spatial patterns and climate drivers of carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of China , 2013, Global change biology.

[16]  Y. Xue,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis , 2012 .

[17]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Comparison of MODIS gross primary production estimates for forests across the U.S.A. with those generated by a simple process model, 3-PGS , 2007 .

[18]  Guirui Yu,et al.  Simulation of diurnal variations of CO2, water and heat fluxes over winter wheat with a model coupled photosynthesis and transpiration , 2006 .

[19]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Remote estimation of gross primary productivity in crops using MODIS 250 m data , 2012 .

[20]  F. Gao,et al.  Estimation of Crop Gross Primary Production (GPP): Fapar(sub Chl) Versus MOD15A2 FPAR , 2014 .

[21]  D. Kuang,et al.  Comparison of multiple models for estimating gross primary production using MODIS and eddy covariance data in Harvard Forest , 2010 .

[22]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[23]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  REMOTE ESTIMATION OF GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN MAIZE , 2011 .

[24]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Terrestrial biosphere model performance for inter‐annual variability of land‐atmosphere CO2 exchange , 2012 .

[25]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[26]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[27]  Wenjiang Huang,et al.  Remote estimation of gross primary production in wheat using chlorophyll-related vegetation indices , 2009 .

[28]  Jinwei Dong,et al.  Sensitivity of vegetation indices and gross primary production of tallgrass prairie to severe drought , 2014 .

[29]  T. A. Black,et al.  Can a satellite-derived estimate of the fraction of PAR absorbed by chlorophyll (FAPARchl) improve predictions of light-use efficiency and ecosystem photosynthesis for a boreal aspen forest? , 2009 .

[30]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Estimation of crop gross primary production (GPP): II. Do scaled MODIS vegetation indices improve performance? , 2015 .

[31]  E. Davidson,et al.  Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest , 2004 .

[32]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Predicting gross primary production from the enhanced vegetation index and photosynthetically active radiation: Evaluation and calibration , 2011 .

[33]  P. Cox,et al.  Observing terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle from space , 2015, Global change biology.

[34]  Xiaomin Sun,et al.  Soil moisture effect on the temperature dependence of ecosystem respiration in a subtropical Pinus plantation of southeastern China , 2006 .

[35]  X. Lee,et al.  Overview of ChinaFLUX and evaluation of its eddy covariance measurement , 2006 .

[36]  Jiyuan Liu,et al.  The Performances of MODIS-GPP and -ET Products in China and Their Sensitivity to Input Data (FPAR/LAI) , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[37]  J. Faundeen,et al.  The 1 km AVHRR global land data set: first stages in implementation , 1994 .

[38]  B. Liu,et al.  A 2010 update of National Land Use/Cover Database of China at 1:100000 scale using medium spatial resolution satellite images , 2014 .

[39]  Jin Chen,et al.  A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter , 2004 .

[40]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Midday values of gross CO2 flux and light use efficiency during satellite overpasses can be used to directly estimate eight-day mean flux , 2005 .

[41]  S. Running,et al.  Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active , 1998 .

[42]  Y A N E R Y A N *, B I N Z H A O,et al.  Closing the carbon budget of estuarine wetlands with tower-based measurements and MODIS time series , 2008 .

[43]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set , 2005 .

[44]  J. Monteith.  SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[45]  T. Vesala,et al.  Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes , 2007 .

[46]  A. Viña,et al.  Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity , 2006 .

[47]  W. Oechel,et al.  A new model of gross primary productivity for North American ecosystems based solely on the enhanced vegetation index and land surface temperature from MODIS , 2008 .

[48]  Guirui Yu,et al.  Seasonal variations of ecosystem apparent quantum yield (α) and maximum photosynthesis rate (Pmax) of different forest ecosystems in China , 2006 .

[49]  F. Baret,et al.  Estimating light absorption by chlorophyll, leaf and canopy in a deciduous broadleaf forest using MODIS data and a radiative transfer model , 2005 .

[50]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Global vegetation gross primary production estimation using satellite-derived light-use efficiency and canopy conductance. , 2015 .

[51]  Jinwei Dong,et al.  Comparison of four EVI-based models for estimating gross primary production of maize and soybean croplands and tallgrass prairie under severe drought , 2015 .

[52]  A. Huete,et al.  A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS , 1997 .

[53]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Evaluating spatial and temporal patterns of MODIS GPP over the conterminous U.S. against flux measurements and a process model , 2012 .

[54]  Xiaomin Sun,et al.  Environmental controls over carbon exchange of three forest ecosystems in eastern China , 2008 .