Forming classes by stimulus frequency: Behavior and theory

Visual classification is the way we relate to different images in our environment as if they were the same, while relating differently to other collections of stimuli (e.g., human vs. animal faces). It is still not clear, however, how the brain forms such classes, especially when introduced with new or changing environments. To isolate a perception-based mechanism underlying class representation, we studied unsupervised classification of an incoming stream of simple images. Classification patterns were clearly affected by stimulus frequency distribution, although subjects were unaware of this distribution. There was a common bias to locate class centers near the most frequent stimuli and their boundaries near the least frequent stimuli. Responses were also faster for more frequent stimuli. Using a minimal, biologically based neural-network model, we demonstrate that a simple, self-organizing representation mechanism based on overlapping tuning curves and slow Hebbian learning suffices to ensure classification. Combined behavioral and theoretical results predict large tuning overlap, implicating posterior infero-temporal cortex as a possible site of classification.

[1]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Violations of Branch Independence in Judgments of the Value of Gambles , 1997 .

[2]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  L. Hasher,et al.  Truly incidental encoding of frequency information. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  Y. Miyashita Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex , 1988, Nature.

[5]  J.A. Anderson,et al.  Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. , 1984 .

[6]  Selby H. Evans,et al.  Free sorting with stimuli clustered in a multidlmensional attribute space , 1969 .

[7]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Induction of category distributions: a framework for classification learning. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[13]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.

[14]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[15]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Keiji Tanaka Mechanisms of visual object recognition: monkey and human studies , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Learning in Neural Networks with Material Synapses , 1994, Neural Computation.

[18]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[19]  B. Younger The segregation of items into categories by ten-month-old infants. , 1985, Child development.

[20]  P. G. Neumann Visual prototype formation with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Cognition: Theory and Applications , 1982 .

[22]  D. Amit,et al.  Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Martha Wilson,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and categorical perception of visual stimuli by monkeys , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[25]  E. Zohary,et al.  Inter-trial neuronal activity in inferior temporal cortex: a putative vehicle to generate long-term visual associations , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Buonomano,et al.  Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  D. Homa,et al.  Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories , 1984 .

[28]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  William K. Estes,et al.  Classification and cognition , 1994 .

[32]  J. Anderson,et al.  Categorization and sensitivity to correlation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  P L Roberts,et al.  Representational Consequences of Two Modes of Learning , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  William A. Roberts,et al.  3 Stimulus generalization and hierarchical structure in categorization by animals , 1996 .