Overt Visual Attention as a Causal Factor of Perceptual Awareness

Our everyday conscious experience of the visual world is fundamentally shaped by the interaction of overt visual attention and object awareness. Although the principal impact of both components is undisputed, it is still unclear how they interact. Here we recorded eye-movements preceding and following conscious object recognition, collected during the free inspection of ambiguous and corresponding unambiguous stimuli. Using this paradigm, we demonstrate that fixations recorded prior to object awareness predict the later recognized object identity, and that subjects accumulate more evidence that is consistent with their later percept than for the alternative. The timing of reached awareness was verified by a reaction-time based correction method and also based on changes in pupil dilation. Control experiments, in which we manipulated the initial locus of visual attention, confirm a causal influence of overt attention on the subsequent result of object perception. The current study thus demonstrates that distinct patterns of overt attentional selection precede object awareness and thereby directly builds on recent electrophysiological findings suggesting two distinct neuronal mechanisms underlying the two phenomena. Our results emphasize the crucial importance of overt visual attention in the formation of our conscious experience of the visual world.

[1]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[3]  C. Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Neural Dissociation between Visual Awareness and Spatial Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Xoana G. Troncoso,et al.  Saccades and microsaccades during visual fixation, exploration, and search: foundations for a common saccadic generator. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[5]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Making large scale SVM learning practical , 1998 .

[6]  Randolph Blake,et al.  A Dissociation of Attention and Awareness in Phase-sensitive but Not Phase-insensitive Visual Channels , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  B. Waterhouse,et al.  Locus Ceruleus Regulates Sensory Encoding by Neurons and Networks in Waking Animals , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Eure Sp,et al.  Reversible figures and eye-movements. , 1956 .

[9]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort,et al.  The Relationship between Visual Awareness, Attention, and Report , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[13]  S. Eure,et al.  Reversible figures and eye-movements. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  Johan Eriksson,et al.  Looking as if you know: Systematic object inspection precedes object recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[15]  G H Fisher "Mother, father, and daughter": a three-aspect ambiguous figure. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[17]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Dissociating the Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention in Change Detection Using Functional MRI , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  L. Squire,et al.  Experience-Dependent Eye Movements Reflect Hippocampus-Dependent (Aware) Memory , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  V. Lamme Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  C. Koch,et al.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Xoana G. Troncoso,et al.  Microsaccades Counteract Visual Fading during Fixation , 2005, Neuron.

[22]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Dynamic cognitive processes , 2005 .

[23]  E. Boring A new ambiguous figure. , 1930 .

[24]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  C. A. Burnham,et al.  The first glimpse determines the perception of an ambiguous figure , 1975 .

[26]  Peter König,et al.  Are switches in perception of the Necker cube related to eye position? , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  Ziad M Hafed,et al.  Ongoing eye movements constrain visual perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  D. Ballard,et al.  What you see is what you need. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[30]  H. Ritter,et al.  Disambiguating Complex Visual Information: Towards Communication of Personal Views of a Scene , 1996, Perception.

[31]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  The relationship between awareness and attention: Evidence from ERP responses , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Disambiguating Ambiguous Figures by Selective Attention , 1985 .

[33]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Xoana G. Troncoso,et al.  Novel Visual Illusions Related to Vasarely's ‘Nested Squares’ Show That Corner Salience Varies with Corner Angle , 2005, Perception.

[35]  Ian M. Thornton,et al.  Representation of Change: Separate Electrophysiological Markers of Attention, Awareness, and Implicit Processing , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Bruce C Hansen,et al.  Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[37]  John Harris,et al.  Biasing Effects in Ambiguous Figures: Removal or Fixation of Critical Features Can Affect Perception , 1997 .

[38]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning , 1999 .

[39]  Takayuki Mori,et al.  Disambiguating ambiguous figures by a model of selective attention , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[40]  Jack Botwinick,et al.  Husband and Father-in-Law: A Reversible Figure , 1961 .

[41]  Ramona O. Hopkins,et al.  Experience-Dependent Eye Movements, Awareness, and Hippocampus-Dependent Memory , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Stephen L Macknik,et al.  Visibility, visual awareness, and visual masking of simple unattended targets are confined to areas in the occipital cortex beyond human V1/V2. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[44]  B. R. Bugelski,et al.  The role of frequency in developing perceptual sets. , 1961, Canadian journal of psychology.

[45]  Xoana G. Troncoso,et al.  Microsaccades drive illusory motion in the Enigma illusion , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  G. H. Fisher,et al.  Preparation of ambiguous stimulus materials , 1967 .

[47]  T. Toppino,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes in the Perception of Reversible Figures: Toward a Hybrid Model , 2005 .

[48]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Interference with Bottom-Up Feature Detection by Higher-Level Object Recognition , 2007, Current Biology.

[49]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  An Information Maximization Model of Eye Movements , 2004, NIPS.

[50]  Xoana G. Troncoso,et al.  BOLD Activation Varies Parametrically with Corner Angle Throughout Human Retinotopic Cortex , 2007, Perception.

[51]  G. H. Fisher,et al.  Ambiguity of form: Old and new , 1968 .

[52]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual consciousness and selective attention , 2007, Neuroreport.

[53]  Zhaoping Li A saliency map in primary visual cortex , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Mary M Hayhoe,et al.  Task and context determine where you look. , 2016, Journal of vision.