This paper presents a framework for expressing how choices are made in systemic grammars. Formalizing the description of choice processes enriches descriptions of the syntax and semantics of languages, and it contributes to constructive models of language use. There are applications in education and computation. The framework represents the grammar as a combination of systemic syntactic description and explicit choice processes, called “choice experts.” Choice experts communicate across the boundary of the grammar to its environment, exploring an external intention to communicate. The environment's answers lead to choices and thereby to creation of sentences and other units, tending to satisfy the intention to communicate. The experts’ communicative framework includes an extension to the systemic notion of a function, in the direction of a more explicit semantics. Choice expert processes are presented in two notations, one informal and the other formal. The informal notation yields a grammar‐guided conver...
[1]
Paul Schachter.
Daughter-Dependency Grammar
,
1980
.
[2]
William C. Mann.
Two Discourse Generators
,
1981,
ACL.
[3]
Richard Hudson,et al.
Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar
,
1976
.
[4]
William C. Mann,et al.
Computer as Author -- Results and Prospects.
,
1980
.
[5]
M. Halliday.
Categories of the theory of grammar
,
1959
.
[6]
Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen.
A Grammar and a Lexicon for a Text-Production System
,
1981,
ACL.
[7]
Michael Halliday,et al.
Readings in Systemic Linguistics
,
1981
.
[8]
William C. Mann.
Text Generation: The State of the Art and the Literature.
,
1981
.
[9]
William C. Mann.
Inquiry Semantics: A Functional Semantics of Natural Language Grammar
,
1983,
EACL.
[10]
Gunther Kress,et al.
System and Function in Language
,
1978
.