Social embeddedness and job performance of tenured and non-tenured professionals

This study examines how different employment relationships in academic settings, ie tenured versus non-tenured appointments, are associated with different types of job performance efforts. The social embeddedness model contends that employees' efforts to perform well depend on embeddedness in the social environment. Adopting this perspective, we ask what types of embeddedness are likely to improve job performance efforts, namely compliance and contextual performance, under the condition of different employment relationships. Regression analyses on the responses of both tenured and non-tenured faculty members show that employees' efforts to perform well can be explained by social embeddedness. Temporal embeddedness appears to be important in explaining the job performance efforts of tenured faculty members, while, in contrast, network embeddedness seems important in explaining the efforts of nontenured faculty members; and institutional embeddedness explained the efforts of both groups of faculty members.

[1]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[2]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  J. Pfeffer Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Lynn A. Isabella,et al.  Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer Relationships in Career Development , 1985 .

[7]  L. Zucker Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[8]  G. Carroll,et al.  Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations , 1991 .

[9]  V. Haines,et al.  Network range and health. , 1992, Journal of health and social behavior.

[10]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Determinants Of Employment Externalization - A Study Of Temporary Workers And Independent Contractors , 1993 .

[11]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance , 1993 .

[12]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  CHANGING OBLIGATIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 1994 .

[13]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. , 1994 .

[14]  Michael J. Lovaglia,et al.  Power and Status , 1995 .

[15]  P. Altbach Problems and possibilities: The US academic profession , 1995 .

[16]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  On The Social Networks Of Managers , 1996 .

[17]  S. Robinson Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[18]  Kathryn H. Dansky,et al.  The Effect of Group Mentoring on Career Outcomes , 1996 .

[19]  D. Organ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time , 1997 .

[20]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Flexible working in Europe , 1997 .

[21]  L. Porter,et al.  Alternative Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off? , 1997 .

[22]  W. Borman,et al.  A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance , 1997 .

[23]  John P. Walsh,et al.  The Effects of Job Characteristics on Active Effort at Work , 1998 .

[24]  M. Poole,et al.  Career Development of Academics: Cross-cultural and Lifespan Factors , 1998 .

[25]  R. Arvey,et al.  Performance evaluation in work settings. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Gina Lai,et al.  Network resources, contact resources, and status attainment , 1998 .

[27]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees. , 1998 .

[28]  Michael W. Kramer,et al.  Feedback Seeking Following Career Transitions , 1999 .

[29]  E. Morrison,et al.  Taking Charge At Work: Extrarole Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change , 1999 .

[30]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. , 1999 .

[31]  Paula Caligiuri,et al.  Effects of Self-Monitoring on Technical, Contextual, and Assignment-Specific Performance , 2000 .

[32]  G. Mcguire,et al.  Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Networks , 2000 .

[33]  Peter J. Makin,et al.  The psychological contract, organisational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff , 2000 .

[34]  Jørn K. Rognes,et al.  Employment relations in Norway: some dimensions and correlates , 2000 .

[35]  J. Bunderson How work ideologies shape the psychological contracts of professional employees: doctors' responses to perceived breach , 2001 .

[36]  At risk of burnout: Gender and faculty differences within academia , 2001 .

[37]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[38]  Timothy B. Folta,et al.  Temporary workers as real options , 2002 .

[39]  K. Sanders,et al.  Differential Effects of Individual-Linked and Team-Level Status Allocation on Professionals’ Job Performance , 2002 .

[40]  James M. Bloodgood,et al.  Not seeing eye to eye: Differences in supervisor and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach. , 2002 .

[41]  H. V. Emmerik,et al.  SOLIDARITY OF TEMPORARY WORKERS EFFECTS OF TEMPORAL AND NETWORK EMBEDDEDNESS ON SOLIDARITY OF PH.D. STUDENTS , 2002 .

[42]  Robert H. Moorman,et al.  Temporary Employees as Good Citizens: Factors Influencing Their OCB Performance , 2002 .

[43]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior , 2002 .