Scrutinizing the Higgs quartic coupling at a future 100 TeV proton–proton collider with taus and b-jets

Abstract The Higgs potential consists of an unexplored territory in which the electroweak symmetry breaking is triggered, and it is moreover directly related to the nature of the electroweak phase transition. Measuring the Higgs boson cubic and quartic couplings, or getting equivalently information on the exact shape of the Higgs potential, is therefore an essential task. However, direct measurements beyond the cubic self-interaction of the Higgs boson consist of a huge challenge, even for a future proton–proton collider expected to operate at a center-of-mass energy of 100 TeV. We present a novel approach to extract model-independent constraints on the triple and quartic Higgs self-coupling by investigating triple Higgs-boson hadroproduction at a center-of-mass energy of 100 TeV, focusing on the τ τ b b ¯ b b ¯ channel that was previously overlooked due to a supposedly too large background. It is thrown into sharp relief that the assist from transverse variables such as m T 2 and a boosted configuration ensures a high signal sensitivity. We derive the luminosities that would be required to constrain given deviations from the Standard Model in the Higgs self-interactions, showing for instance that a 2σ sensitivity could be achieved for an integrated luminosity of 30 ab − 1 when Standard Model properties are assumed. With the prospects of combining these findings with other triple-Higgs search channels, the Standard Model Higgs quartic coupling could in principle be reached with a significance beyond the 3σ level.

[1]  Q. Yan,et al.  Probing triple-Higgs productions via $4b2\gamma$ decay channel at a 100 TeV hadron collider , 2015, 1510.04013.

[2]  Speedy Higgs boson discovery in decays to tau lepton pairs: h → ττ , 2011, 1106.2322.

[3]  Wolfgang Kilian,et al.  New physics in multi-Higgs boson final states , 2017, 1702.03554.

[4]  R. S. Thorne,et al.  Parton distributions for the LHC , 2007, 0901.0002.

[5]  Olivier Mattelaer,et al.  Automated event generation for loop-induced processes , 2015, 1507.00020.

[6]  Andreas Papaefstathiou,et al.  Triple Higgs boson production at a 100 TeV proton-proton collider , 2015, 1508.06524.

[7]  D. Florian,et al.  Higgs pair production at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy at the LHC , 2015, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[8]  Claude Duhr,et al.  UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[9]  A. Barr,et al.  Measuring the Higgs boson mass in dileptonic W -boson decays at hadron colliders , 2009, 0902.4864.

[10]  R. Frederix,et al.  The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , 2014, 1405.0301.

[11]  S. Mrenna,et al.  Pythia 6.3 physics and manual , 2003, hep-ph/0308153.

[12]  Matthew J. Dolan,et al.  Di-Higgs final states augMT2ed – Selecting hh events at the high luminosity LHC , 2013, 1309.6318.

[13]  Leandro G. Almeida,et al.  Template Overlap Method for Massive Jets , 2010, 1006.2035.

[14]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[15]  S. Karg,et al.  Multi-Higgs boson production in the standard model and beyond , 2006 .

[16]  M. Cacciari,et al.  The anti-$k_t$ jet clustering algorithm , 2008, 0802.1189.

[17]  Claude Duhr,et al.  FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[18]  Mihailo Backovic,et al.  TemplateTagger v1.0.0: A template matching tool for jet substructure , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[19]  A. Barr,et al.  Weighing wimps with kinks at colliders: invisible particle mass measurements from endpoints , 2007, 0711.4008.

[20]  N. Arkani-Hamed,et al.  Physics opportunities of a 100 TeV proton–proton collider , 2015, 1511.06495.

[21]  Céline Degrande,et al.  Automatic evaluation of UV and R2 terms for beyond the Standard Model Lagrangians: A proof-of-principle , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[22]  A. Randle-conde,et al.  Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at √s = 7 and 8 TeV , 2016 .

[23]  M. Cacciari,et al.  FastJet user manual , 2011, 1111.6097.

[24]  Tilman Plehn,et al.  Quartic Higgs coupling at hadron colliders , 2005 .

[25]  C. Lester,et al.  Measuring masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders , 1999, hep-ph/9906349.

[26]  K. Nikolopoulos,et al.  Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Higgs and EW symmetry breaking studies , 2016, 1606.09408.

[27]  Jeong Han Kim,et al.  Probing Higgs boson self-interactions in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 100 TeV , 2015, 1510.07697.

[28]  M. Neubert Model-Independent Analysis of $B \to \pi K$ Decays and Bounds on the Weak Phase $\gamma$ , 1998, hep-ph/9812396.

[29]  K. Cranmer,et al.  Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.

[30]  A. Barr,et al.  m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour , 2003, hep-ph/0304226.

[31]  S. Forte,et al.  Parton distributions with LHC data , 2012, 1207.1303.

[32]  Matthew J. Dolan,et al.  Higgs self-coupling measurements at the LHC , 2012, 1206.5001.

[33]  Leandro G. Almeida,et al.  Three-particle templates for a boosted Higgs boson , 2011, 1112.1957.

[34]  D. Florian,et al.  Two-loop corrections to the triple Higgs boson production cross section , 2016, 1610.05012.

[35]  E. Vryonidou,et al.  Top-quark mass effects in double and triple Higgs production in gluon-gluon fusion at NLO , 2014, 1408.6542.

[36]  Jeong Han Kim,et al.  Probing TeV scale top-philic resonances with boosted top-tagging at the high luminosity LHC , 2016, 1604.07421.

[37]  M. Mühlleitner,et al.  The measurement of the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC: theoretical status , 2012, 1212.5581.

[38]  Andrei,et al.  Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at √s = 7 and 8 TeV , 2016, 1606.02266.

[39]  R. Contino,et al.  Effective field theory analysis of double Higgs boson production via gluon fusion , 2015 .