Identification, Comparison, and Validation of Robust Rumen Microbial Biomarkers for Methane Emissions Using Diverse Bos Taurus Breeds and Basal Diets

Previous shotgun metagenomic analyses of ruminal digesta identified some microbial information that might be useful as biomarkers to select cattle that emit less methane (CH4), which is a potent greenhouse gas. It is known that methane production (g/kgDMI) and to an extent the microbial community is heritable and therefore biomarkers can offer a method of selecting cattle for low methane emitting phenotypes. In this study a wider range of Bos Taurus cattle, varying in breed and diet, was investigated to determine microbial communities and genetic markers associated with high/low CH4 emissions. Digesta samples were taken from 50 beef cattle, comprising four cattle breeds, receiving two basal diets containing different proportions of concentrate and also including feed additives (nitrate or lipid), that may influence methane emissions. A combination of partial least square analysis and network analysis enabled the identification of the most significant and robust biomarkers of CH4 emissions (VIP > 0.8) across diets and breeds when comparing all potential biomarkers together. Genes associated with the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis pathway converting carbon dioxide to methane, provided the dominant biomarkers of CH4 emissions and methanogens were the microbial populations most closely correlated with CH4 emissions and identified by metagenomics. Moreover, these genes grouped together as confirmed by network analysis for each independent experiment and when combined. Finally, the genes involved in the methane synthesis pathway explained a higher proportion of variation in CH4 emissions by PLS analysis compared to phylogenetic parameters or functional genes. These results confirmed the reproducibility of the analysis and the advantage to use these genes as robust biomarkers of CH4 emissions. Volatile fatty acid concentrations and ratios were significantly correlated with CH4, but these factors were not identified as robust enough for predictive purposes. Moreover, the methanotrophic Methylomonas genus was found to be negatively correlated with CH4. Finally, this study confirmed the importance of using robust and applicable biomarkers from the microbiome as a proxy of CH4 emissions across diverse production systems and environments.

[1]  W. Liesack,et al.  Opitutus terrae gen. nov., sp. nov., to accommodate novel strains of the division 'Verrucomicrobia' isolated from rice paddy soil. , 2001, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[2]  A. Cherdthong,et al.  Dietary sources and their effects on animal production and environmental sustainability , 2015, Animal nutrition.

[3]  L. Guan,et al.  Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation , 2017, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[4]  S. Tringe,et al.  Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae Implicated in Low Methane Emissions from Tammar Wallabies , 2011, Science.

[5]  I. Tapio,et al.  The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock , 2017, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[6]  L. Barton,et al.  Microbe–Microbe Interactions , 2011 .

[7]  Sharon L. Grim,et al.  Diverse, rare microbial taxa responded to the Deepwater Horizon deep-sea hydrocarbon plume , 2015, The ISME Journal.

[8]  D. Johnson,et al.  Methane emissions from cattle. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[9]  Qiang He,et al.  Linkages of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes populations to methanogenic process performance , 2016, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[10]  M. Faires,et al.  The Use of Direct‐Fed Microbials to Reduce Shedding of Escherichia coli O157 in Beef Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis , 2015, Zoonoses and public health.

[11]  Robert J. Wallace,et al.  Nitrate and Inhibition of Ruminal Methanogenesis: Microbial Ecology, Obstacles, and Opportunities for Lowering Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[12]  C. Martin,et al.  Long-term effect of linseed plus nitrate fed to dairy cows on enteric methane emission and nitrate and nitrite residuals in milk. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[13]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  C. Martin,et al.  Additive methane-mitigating effect between linseed oil and nitrate fed to cattle. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[15]  F. Strozzi,et al.  Application of meta-omics techniques to understand greenhouse gas emissions originating from ruminal metabolism , 2017, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[16]  D. Morgavi,et al.  Rumen protozoa and methanogenesis: not a simple cause–effect relationship , 2011, British Journal of Nutrition.

[17]  B. White,et al.  Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[18]  Dongwan D. Kang,et al.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome , 2014, Genome research.

[19]  E. Rubin,et al.  Rumen metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of low methane yield sheep reveals a Sharpea-enriched microbiome characterised by lactic acid formation and utilisation , 2016, Microbiome.

[20]  Donovan H. Parks,et al.  Methylotrophic methanogenesis discovered in the archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota , 2016, Nature Microbiology.

[21]  Derrick E. Wood,et al.  Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments , 2014, Genome Biology.

[22]  R. Herd,et al.  Genetic Variation for Methane Traits in Beef Cattle , 2014 .

[23]  Mick Watson,et al.  Bovine Host Genetic Variation Influences Rumen Microbial Methane Production with Best Selection Criterion for Low Methane Emitting and Efficiently Feed Converting Hosts Based on Metagenomic Gene Abundance , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[24]  Christine L. Sun,et al.  Seasonal Changes in Methanogenesis and Methanogenic Community in Three Peatlands, New York State , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[25]  S. Troy,et al.  Impact of adding nitrate or increasing the lipid content of two contrasting diets on blood methaemoglobin and performance of two breeds of finishing beef steers. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[26]  J. Jiao,et al.  Investigation and manipulation of metabolically active methanogen community composition during rumen development in black goats , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[27]  T. Miller,et al.  Microbe-microbe interactions , 1997 .

[28]  Stijn van Dongen,et al.  Construction, Visualisation, and Clustering of Transcription Networks from Microarray Expression Data , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  C. Martin,et al.  The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[30]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Thermodynamic Driving Force of Hydrogen on Rumen Microbial Metabolism: A Theoretical Investigation , 2016, PloS one.

[31]  William J. Kelly,et al.  The Genome Sequence of the Rumen Methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium Reveals New Possibilities for Controlling Ruminant Methane Emissions , 2010, PloS one.

[32]  Siva Ganesh,et al.  Two Different Bacterial Community Types Are Linked with the Low-Methane Emission Trait in Sheep , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  Nicole R. Buan,et al.  Methanogenesis by Methanosarcina acetivorans involves two structurally and functionally distinct classes of heterodisulfide reductase , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[34]  G. Gottschalk,et al.  More Than 200 Genes Required for Methane Formation from H2 and CO2 and Energy Conservation Are Present in Methanothermobacter marburgensis and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus , 2011, Archaea.

[35]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Methane production by ruminants , 2012 .

[36]  J. Hyslop,et al.  Archaeal abundance in post-mortem ruminal digesta may help predict methane emissions from beef cattle , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Kun-Hong Lee,et al.  Inhibition of methane and natural gas hydrate formation by altering the structure of water with amino acids , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[38]  W P Weiss,et al.  Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Invited review: Large-scale indirect measurements for enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle: A review of proxies and their potential for use in management and breeding decisions. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  C. Martin,et al.  Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[41]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[42]  S. Hay,et al.  Antibiotic resistance: mitigation opportunities in livestock sector development. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[43]  C. Joshi,et al.  Exploring diet-dependent shifts in methanogen and methanotroph diversity in the rumen of Mehsani buffalo by a metagenomics approach , 2015 .

[44]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Technical note: Comparison of biomarker and molecular biological methods for estimating methanogen abundance. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[45]  R. Prins,et al.  Regulation of lactate metabolism in the rumen , 1981, Veterinary Research Communications.

[46]  B. Hayes,et al.  Metagenomic Predictions: From Microbiome to Complex Health and Environmental Phenotypes in Humans and Cattle , 2013, PloS one.

[47]  S. Gribaldo,et al.  Phylogenomic Data Support a Seventh Order of Methylotrophic Methanogens and Provide Insights into the Evolution of Methanogenesis , 2013, Genome biology and evolution.

[48]  Hélène Touzet,et al.  Assessment of Common and Emerging Bioinformatics Pipelines for Targeted Metagenomics , 2017, PloS one.

[49]  Min Wang,et al.  Erratum: Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[50]  The complete genome sequence of the methanogenic archaeon ISO4-H5 provides insights into the methylotrophic lifestyle of a ruminal representative of the Methanomassiliicoccales , 2016, Standards in genomic sciences.

[51]  Mick Watson,et al.  The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[52]  M. Haskell,et al.  The impact of divergent breed types and diets on methane emissions, rumen characteristics and performance of finishing beef cattle. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[53]  B. McBride,et al.  Methanogens: Methane Producers of the Rumen and Mitigation Strategies , 2010, Archaea.

[54]  J. Hyslop,et al.  Hydrogen and methane emissions from beef cattle and their rumen microbial community vary with diet, time after feeding and genotype , 2014, British Journal of Nutrition.

[55]  P. Janssen Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics , 2010 .

[56]  A. Spang,et al.  Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen , 2013, Nature Communications.

[57]  T. Maruyama,et al.  Substrate Preference in a Strain of Megasphaera elsdenii, a Ruminal Bacterium, and Its Implications in Propionate Production and Growth Competition , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[58]  G. Coleman,et al.  The Rumen Protozoa , 1992, Brock/Springer Series in Contemporary Bioscience.

[59]  Dong Li,et al.  The Glycobiome of the Rumen Bacterium Butyrivibrio proteoclasticus B316T Highlights Adaptation to a Polysaccharide-Rich Environment , 2010, PloS one.

[60]  E. Pinaud,et al.  Eμ and 3′RR IgH enhancers show hierarchic unilateral dependence in mature B-cells , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[61]  S. Wiedemann,et al.  Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review , 2011 .

[62]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Compositional mixed modeling of methane emissions and ruminal volatile fatty acids from individual cattle and multiple experiments. , 2017, Journal of animal science.

[63]  A. Bach,et al.  Short communication: Comparison of pH, volatile fatty acids, and microbiome of rumen samples from preweaned calves obtained via cannula or stomach tube. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[64]  J. Russell,et al.  Energy-yielding and energy-consuming reactions , 1997 .

[65]  R Roehe,et al.  The effect of dietary addition of nitrate or increase in lipid concentrations, alone or in combination, on performance and methane emissions of beef cattle. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[66]  J. McEwan,et al.  Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[67]  H. Gonda,et al.  Methane Production in Dairy Cows Correlates with Rumen Methanogenic and Bacterial Community Structure , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[68]  J. Moorby,et al.  Does Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Production Affect Rumen Function and Animal Productivity in Dairy Cows? , 2015, PloS one.

[69]  A. R. Moss,et al.  Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming , 2000 .

[70]  C. V. Van Nevel,et al.  Attempts to induce reductive acetogenesis into a sheep rumen. , 1996, Archiv fur Tierernahrung.

[71]  D. Sauvant Methane production in sheep in relation to concentrate feed composition from bibliographic data. , 2000 .

[72]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Effect of dietary nitrate level on enteric methane production, hydrogen emission, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[73]  Anne-Kristin Kaster,et al.  Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[74]  Jung-Hoon Park,et al.  Anaerobic degradation of amino acids generated from the hydrolysis of sewage sludge , 2014, Environmental technology.