Visual acuity testing. From the laboratory to the clinic

The need for precision in visual acuity assessment for low vision research led to the design of the Bailey-Lovie letter chart. This paper describes the decisions behind the design principles used and how the logarithmic progression of sizes led to the development of the logMAR designation of visual acuity and the improved sensitivity gained from letter-by-letter scoring. While the principles have since been adopted by most major clinical research studies and for use in most low vision clinics, use of charts of this design and application of letter-by-letter scoring are also important for the accurate assessment of visual acuity in any clinical setting. We discuss the test protocols that should be applied to visual acuity testing and the use of other tests for assessing profound low vision when the limits of visual acuity measurement by letter charts are reached.

[1]  Ian L. Bailey,et al.  Task Complexity and Visual Acuity in Senile Macular Degeneration , 1981 .

[2]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Learning to imitate novel motion sequences. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[3]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[4]  I L Bailey,et al.  The Design and Use of a New Near‐Vision Chart , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[5]  Ulrike Willinger,et al.  Eine neue Lesetafel* zur gleichzeitigen Bestimmung von Lesevisus und Lesegeschwindigkeit , 1998 .

[6]  Michael Bach,et al.  Basic quantitative assessment of visual performance in patients with very low vision. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[8]  H. Snellen.  Letterproeven, tot bepaling der gezigtsscherpte , 1862 .

[9]  Chris A Johnson,et al.  A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  G. Westheimer.  Scaling of visual acuity measurements. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Denis G Pelli,et al.  Amblyopic reading is crowded. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  Bennett Ag.  Ophthalmic test types. A review of previous work and discussions on some controversial questions. , 1965 .

[13]  I L Bailey,et al.  Repeatability of Visual Acuity Measurement , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  David B Elliott,et al.  The Dependency of LogMAR Visual Acuity Measurements on Chart Design and Scoring Rule , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Grating Acuity and Contrast Tests for Clinical Trials of Severe Vision Loss , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  M Velikay-Parel,et al.  [A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed]. , 1998, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[17]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  Andrew Carkeet,et al.  The Slope of the Psychometric Function for Bailey-Lovie Letter Charts: Defocus Effects and Implications for Modeling Letter-By-Letter Scores , 2001, Optometry and Vision Science.

[19]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Visual Acuity and Chart Luminance , 1984, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[20]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  A Carkeet,et al.  Modeling logMAR Visual Acuity Scores: Effects of Termination Rules and Alternative Forced-Choice Options , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  J Green,et al.  On a New Series of Test-Letters for determining the Acuteness of Vision. , 1868, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[23]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[24]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Repeated Visual Acuity Measurement: Establishing the Patient's Own Criterion for Change , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  Ian L Bailey,et al.  The Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  A Arditi,et al.  On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[28]  F L Ferris,et al.  Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[29]  N. Bressler,et al.  Visual acuity as an outcome measure in clinical trials of retinal diseases. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[30]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[31]  I L Bailey,et al.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  J Green,et al.  Notes on the clinical determination of the acuteness of vision, including the construction and gradation of optotypes, and on systems of notation. , 1905, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[33]  L L SLOAN,et al.  New test charts for the measurement of visual acuity at far and near distances. , 1959, American journal of ophthalmology.