Thigmomorphogenesis: changes in the morphology and mechanical properties of two Populus hybrids in response to mechanical perturbation.

To identify hybrid-specific differences in developmental response to mechanical perturbation (MP), we compared the effects of stem flexure on several morphological and mechanical properties of two Populus trichocarpa Torr. & A. Gray x P. deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh. hybrids, 47-174 and 11-11. In response to the MP treatment, both hybrids exhibited a significant increase in radial growth, especially in the direction of the MP (47-174, P = 0.0001; 11-11, P = 0.002), and a significant decrease in height to diameter growth ratio (P = 0.0001 for both hybrids), suggesting that MP-treated stems are more tapered than control stems. A direct consequence of the MP-induced increase in radial growth was a significant increase in flexural rigidity (EI, N mm(2)) in stems of both hybrids (47-174, P = 0.0001; 11-11, P = 0.009). Both control and MP-treated stems of Hybrid 47-174 had significantly greater height to diameter ratios and EI values than the corresponding stems of Hybrid 11-11 (11-11 stem ratios and EI values were 85 and 76%, respectively, of those of 47-174). In Hybrid 47-174, Young's modulus of elasticity (E, N mm(-2)), a measure of stem flexibility, for MP-treated stems was only 80% of the control value (P = 0.0034), whereas MP had no significant effect on E of stems of Hybrid 11-11 (P = 0.2720). Differences in flexure response between the hybrids suggest that Hybrid 47-174 can produce a stem that is more tolerant of wind-induced flexure by altering both stem allometry and material properties, whereas Hybrid 11-11 relies solely on changes in stem allometry for enhanced stability under MP conditions.

[1]  Stephen A. Wainwright,et al.  Mechanical Design in Organisms , 2020 .

[2]  C. Harrington,et al.  Above- and below-ground characteristics associated with wind toppling in a young Populus plantation , 1996, Trees.

[3]  F. Telewski,et al.  Wind and Trees: Wind-induced physiological and developmental responses in trees , 1995 .

[4]  C. Mattheck.  Trees: The Mechanical Design , 1991 .

[5]  F. Telewski,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: anatomical, morphological and mechanical analysis of genetically different sibs of Pinus taeda in response to mechanical perturbation. , 1986, Physiologia plantarum.

[6]  F. Telewski,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: field and laboratory studies of Abies fraseri in response to wind or mechanical perturbation. , 1986, Physiologia plantarum.

[7]  R. Lawton.  WIND STRESS AND ELFIN STATURE IN A MONTANE RAIN FOREST TREE: AN ADAPTIVE EXPLANATION , 1982 .

[8]  F. Telewski,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: changes in the morphology and chemical composition induced by mechanical perturbation in 6-month-old Pinustaeda seedlings , 1981 .

[9]  E. Hunt,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: Changes in Cell Division and Elongation in the Internodes of Mechanically-perturbed or Ethrel-treated Bean Plants , 1980 .

[10]  M. J. Jaffe,et al.  Morphogenetic Responses of Plants to Mechanical Stimuli or Stress , 1980 .

[11]  Robert R. Archer,et al.  Tree Design: Some Biological Solutions to Mechanical Problems , 1979 .

[12]  M. Jaffe.  Thigmomorphogenesis: A Detailed Characterization of the Response of Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to Mechanical Stimulation , 1976 .

[13]  T. McMahon,et al.  Size and Shape in Biology , 1973, Science.

[14]  P. Neel,et al.  Motion-Induced Inhibition of Elongation and Induction of Dormancy in Liquidambar , 1971, Science.

[15]  R Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[16]  F. Telewski,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: a dose response to flexing in Ulmus americana seedlings. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[17]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Mechanics of Materials, 3rd Ed. , 1991 .

[18]  N. L. Biddington,et al.  The Effect of Mechanically Induced Stress on the Growth of Cauliflower, Lettuce and Celery Seedlings , 1985 .

[19]  Jacobs,et al.  The effect of wind sway on the form and development of Pinus radiata D. Don , 1954 .