Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of the Breast: The Nonmalignant Categories

Currently, accurate diagnosis of breast lesions depends on a triple assessment approach comprising clinical, imaging and pathologic examinations. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is widely adopted for the pathologic assessment because of its accurracy and ease of use. While much has been written about the atypical and maliganant categories of FNAC diagnosis, little covers the non-malignanat category which represents a sheer number in all FNAC cases. Moreover, any false-negative diagnosis of the non-malignant cases may lead to missed diagnosis of cancer. This paper aims to discuss the issues of smear adequacy, the cytologic features of benign breast lesions and the dilemma of a false-negative aspirate. Much has been suggested about the smear adequacy criterion, including quantifying epithelial clusters, whereas others advocate basing adequacy on qualitative quantum of using noncellular features of FNAC. Various benign lesions could be easily diagnosed at FNAC; however, they have cytologic features overlapped with malignant lesions. False negativity of FNAC does occur; this could be caused by either “true” false-negative cases attributed to suboptimal sampling technique, poor localization of the mass or nonpalpable lesions or “false” false-negative cases due to interpretational errors. Though false-positive cases are less commonly found, they will also be discussed briefly.

[1]  M. Briley,et al.  The role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions , 2001, Journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  S. Coghill,et al.  Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of the Breast: Factors Affecting Sensitivity , 1991, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[3]  The Uniform Approach to Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy: A Synopsis , 1996, Acta cytologica.

[4]  W A Schmidt,et al.  Usefulness of the triple test score for palpable breast masses; discussion 1012-3. , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[5]  G. Tse,et al.  MULTINUCLEATED STROMAL GIANT CELLS IN MAMMARY PHYLLODES TUMOURS , 2001, Pathology.

[6]  P. J. Howanitz,et al.  Interinstitutional comparison of performance in breast fine-needle aspiration cytology. A Q-probe quality indicator study. , 1991, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  Accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the breast. , 1997, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[8]  N. Sneige,et al.  Specimen adequacy and false‐negative diagnosis rate in fine‐needle aspirates of palpable breast masses , 1998, Cancer.

[9]  Lee Kr,et al.  Fine needle aspiration of the breast. Importance of the aspirator. , 1987 .

[10]  S. M. Kollur,et al.  FNA of breast fibroadenoma: observer variability and review of cytomorphology with cytohistological correlation , 2006, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[11]  P. Tan,et al.  Calcification in breast lesions: pathologists’ perspective , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[12]  M P Mano,et al.  Role of fine‐needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: Analysis of a series of 4,110 cases , 1998, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[13]  B. Fornage,et al.  In search of specimen adequacy in fine-needle aspirates of nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1997, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  S. Tangjitgamol,et al.  Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology from breast masses in Thailand. , 2009, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[15]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Rate of insufficient samples for fine‐needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial , 1998, Cancer.

[16]  M. Yakushiji,et al.  Spontaneous Infarction of an Intraductal Papilloma of the Breast: Cytological Presentation On Fine Needle Aspiration , 1992, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[17]  Takashi Ishikawa,et al.  False-positive and false-negative cases of fine-needle aspiration cytology for palpable breast lesions , 2007, Breast cancer.

[18]  Pham The Vinh,et al.  Atypia in fine needle aspirates of breast lesions , 2010, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[19]  J. Chan,et al.  Histologic Changes in the Breast after Fine‐Needle Aspiration , 1994, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  B. Fornage,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions , 1999, Cancer.

[21]  W. Goodson,et al.  Three year follow-up of benign fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the breast. , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[22]  B. Fornage,et al.  Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions. Cytologic and histologic findings. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[23]  B. Glasgow,et al.  What constitutes an adequate smear in fine‐needle aspiration cytology of the breast? , 1997, Cancer.

[24]  R. Foster,et al.  Fine needle aspiration of the breast. Importance of the aspirator. , 1987, Acta cytologica.

[25]  I. Park,et al.  Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions. Histologic subtype in false negative cases. , 1997, Acta cytologica.

[26]  S. Masood,et al.  The value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of palpable breast lesions , 2012, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[27]  J. K. Martin,et al.  Fine-needle aspiration of the breast. , 1986, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[28]  D. Page,et al.  Clinical correlates of false-negative fine needle aspirations of the breast in a consecutive series of 1,005 patients. , 1993, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[29]  M. Bibbo,et al.  The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees. , 1997, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[30]  N. Moatamed,et al.  A retrospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of fine‐needle aspiration for breast lesions and implications for future use , 2008, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[31]  P. Tan,et al.  Diagnosing breast lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy: which is better? , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[32]  G. Feichter,et al.  Breast cytology. Statistical analysis and cytohistologic correlations. , 1997, Acta cytologica.

[33]  M Rubin,et al.  Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[34]  P. Tan,et al.  Fine needle aspiration cytology of papillary lesions of the breast: how accurate is the diagnosis? , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[35]  W. Frable,et al.  Subclassification of benign breast disease by fine needle aspiration cytology. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings in 265 palpable breast masses. , 1994, Acta cytologica.

[36]  P. Gattuso,et al.  Fine-needle aspiration of 697 palpable breast lesions with histopathologic correlation. , 1997, Surgery.

[37]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Analysis of morphologic patterns of fine‐needle aspiration of the breast to reduce false‐negative results in breast cytology , 2005, Cancer.

[38]  M. Cranor,et al.  Multinucleated stromal giant cells in mammary fibroepithelial neoplasms. A study of 11 patients. , 1994, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[39]  Cieśla Diagnostic cytopathology of the breast , 1999, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[40]  C. Scopa,et al.  Sources of diagnostic discrepancies in fine‐ needle aspiration of the breast , 1991, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[41]  L. Howell,et al.  Adequacy evaluation of fine‐needle aspiration biopsy in the breast health clinic setting , 2004, Cancer.